Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Flynn, Darren

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 63

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022The Effectiveness and Active Ingredients of Social Prescribing Interventions Targeting Mental Health: A Systematic Review63citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ashley, Kirsten
1 / 1 shared
Avery, Leah
1 / 2 shared
Errington, Linda
1 / 1 shared
Cooper, Matthew
1 / 1 shared
Jordan, Cara
1 / 1 shared
Scott, Jason
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ashley, Kirsten
  • Avery, Leah
  • Errington, Linda
  • Cooper, Matthew
  • Jordan, Cara
  • Scott, Jason
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The Effectiveness and Active Ingredients of Social Prescribing Interventions Targeting Mental Health: A Systematic Review

  • Ashley, Kirsten
  • Avery, Leah
  • Errington, Linda
  • Flynn, Darren
  • Cooper, Matthew
  • Jordan, Cara
  • Scott, Jason
Abstract

Objective To establish the effectiveness and active ingredients of UK-based social<br/>prescribing interventions targeting mental health and well-being outcomes.<br/><br/>Design Systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines, and a published protocol. Data Sources Nine databases were systematically searched up to March 2022.<br/>Eligibility Criteria Social prescribing interventions in the UK involving adults aged &gt;18 years, which reported on mental health outcomes. Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics; outcomes; referral pathways; treatment fidelity strategies; person-centredness; intervention development processes; and theory-linked Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs). Data were narratively synthesised.<br/><br/>Results 52,074 records were retrieved by the search, 13 interventions reported across 17 studies were included in this review (N=5,036 participants at post-intervention). Fifteen studies were uncontrolled before and after designs, one a randomised controlled trial and one a matched groups design. The most frequently reported referral pathway was the link worker model (n=12), followed by direct referrals from community services (n=3). Participants were predominantly working age adults, and were referred for anxiety, depression, social isolation, and loneliness. 16 out of 17 studies reported statistically significant improvements in outcomes mental health, mental wellbeing, general health, or quality of life). Strategies to enhance treatment fidelity were sub-optimal across studies. Only two studies utilised a specific theoretical framework. Few studies reported engaging service users in co-design (n=2) or usability and/or feasibility testing (n=4). Overall, 22 BCTs were coded across 13 interventions. The most frequently coded BCTs were social support-unspecified (n=11), credible source (n=7) and social support-practical (n=6).<br/><br/>Conclusions Robust conclusions on the effectiveness of social prescribing for mental health related outcomes cannot be made. Future research would benefit from comprehensive intervention developmental processes, with reference to appropriate theory, alongside long term follow-up outcome assessment, utilising treatment fidelity strategies, and a focus on principle of person-centred care.

Topics
  • theory
  • extraction