Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sharma, Pankhuri

  • Google
  • 1
  • 12
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021The PROMISES Study3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mehra, Sunil
1 / 1 shared
Tayade, Atul
1 / 1 shared
Shivkumar, V. B.
1 / 1 shared
Shivkumar, Poonam Varma
1 / 1 shared
Team, On Behalf Of The Promises Study
1 / 1 shared
Ashworth, Danielle
1 / 1 shared
Ghule, Mohan
1 / 1 shared
Garg, Priyanka R.
1 / 1 shared
Kathuria, Nishtha
1 / 1 shared
Tribe, Rachel
1 / 3 shared
Silverio, Sergio A.
1 / 1 shared
Khan, Simi
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mehra, Sunil
  • Tayade, Atul
  • Shivkumar, V. B.
  • Shivkumar, Poonam Varma
  • Team, On Behalf Of The Promises Study
  • Ashworth, Danielle
  • Ghule, Mohan
  • Garg, Priyanka R.
  • Kathuria, Nishtha
  • Tribe, Rachel
  • Silverio, Sergio A.
  • Khan, Simi
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The PROMISES Study

  • Mehra, Sunil
  • Tayade, Atul
  • Shivkumar, V. B.
  • Shivkumar, Poonam Varma
  • Team, On Behalf Of The Promises Study
  • Sharma, Pankhuri
  • Ashworth, Danielle
  • Ghule, Mohan
  • Garg, Priyanka R.
  • Kathuria, Nishtha
  • Tribe, Rachel
  • Silverio, Sergio A.
  • Khan, Simi
Abstract

Introduction: India has an overall neonatal mortality rate of 28/1000 live births, with higher rates in rural India.Approximately 3.5 million pregnancies in India are affected by preterm birth annually and contribute to approximately a quarter of preterm births globally.Embedded within the PROMISES study (which aims to validate a low-cost salivary progesterone test for early detection of preterm birth risk) we present a mixed methods explanatory sequential feasibility sub-study of the salivary progesterone test.<br/><br/>Methods: A pre- and post-training questionnaire to assess Accredited Social Health Activists (n=201) knowledge and experience of preterm birth and salivary progesterone sampling was analysed using the McNemar test. Descriptive statistics for a cross-sectional survey of pregnant women (n=400) are presented in which the acceptability of this test for pregnant women is assessed. Structured interviews were undertaken with Accredited Social Health Activists (n=10) and pregnant women (n=9) and were analysed using Thematic Framework Analysis to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing the use of this test in rural India.<br/><br/>Results: Before training ASHAs knowledge of PTB (including risk factors, causes, postnatal support and testing) was very limited. After the training programme, there was a significant improvement in the ASHAs’ knowledge of PTB. All four hundred women reported the salivary test was acceptable with the majority finding it easy but not quick or better than drawing blood. For the qualitative aspects of the study analysis of interview data with ASHAs and women, our thematic framework comprised of three main areas: Implementation of Intervention; Networks of Influence; and Access to Healthcare. Qualitative data were stratified and presented as barriers and facilitators.<br/><br/>Conclusion: This study suggests support for ongoing investigations validating preterm birth testing using salivary progesterone in rural settings.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • drawing