Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mitchell, Thomas M.

  • Google
  • 4
  • 11
  • 140

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2019Fault reactivation and strain partitioning across the brittle-ductile transition33citations
  • 2018Absence of Stress-Induced Anisotropy During Brittle Deformation in Antigorite Serpentinite21citations
  • 2014Clast-cortex aggregates in experimental and natural calcite-bearing fault zones29citations
  • 2013The structure of an exhumed intraplate seismogenic fault in crystalline basement57citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Brantut, Nicolas
2 / 7 shared
Meyer, Gabriel
1 / 1 shared
Meredith, Philip G.
1 / 2 shared
David, Emmanuel C.
1 / 2 shared
Hansen, Lars N.
1 / 5 shared
Smith, Steven A. F.
2 / 2 shared
Di Toro, Giulio
2 / 5 shared
Rempe, Marieke
1 / 1 shared
Ferri, Fabio
1 / 2 shared
Bistacchi, Andrea
1 / 1 shared
Mittempergher, Silvia
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018
2014
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Brantut, Nicolas
  • Meyer, Gabriel
  • Meredith, Philip G.
  • David, Emmanuel C.
  • Hansen, Lars N.
  • Smith, Steven A. F.
  • Di Toro, Giulio
  • Rempe, Marieke
  • Ferri, Fabio
  • Bistacchi, Andrea
  • Mittempergher, Silvia
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fault reactivation and strain partitioning across the brittle-ductile transition

  • Brantut, Nicolas
  • Mitchell, Thomas M.
  • Meyer, Gabriel
  • Meredith, Philip G.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The so-called “brittle-ductile transition” is thought to be the strongest part of the lithosphere, and defines the lower limit of the seismogenic zone. It is characterized not only by a transition from localized to distributed (ductile) deformation, but also by a gradual change in microscale deformation mechanism, from microcracking to crystal plasticity. These two transitions can occur separately under different conditions. The threshold conditions bounding the transitions are expected to control how deformation is partitioned between localized fault slip and bulk ductile deformation. Here, we report results from triaxial deformation experiments on pre-faulted cores of Carrara marble over a range of confining pressures, and determine the relative partitioning of the total deformation between bulk strain and on-fault slip. We find that the transition initiates when fault strength (σf) exceeds the yield stress (σy) of the bulk rock, and terminates when it exceeds its ductile flow stress (σflow). In this domain, yield in the bulk rock occurs first, and fault slip is reactivated as a result of bulk strain hardening. The contribution of fault slip to the total deformation is proportional to the ratio (σf − σy)/(σflow − σy). We propose an updated crustal strength profile extending the localized-ductile transition toward shallower regions where the strength of the crust would be limited by fault friction, but significant proportions of tectonic deformation could be accommodated simultaneously by distributed ductile flow.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • strength
  • plasticity
  • deformation mechanism
  • crystal plasticity