• Arbyn, Marc
• Bonde, Jesper
• Preti, Eleonora Petra
• Latsuzbaia, Ardashel
• Guerrieri, Maria Elena
• Group, Extended Valhudes Study
• Andrease, Emilie Korsgaard
• Bottari, Fabio
• Martella, Silvia
• Sechi, Illari
• Dettori, Arianna
• Cocuzza, Clementina Elvezia
• Passerini, Rita
• Muresu, Narcisa
• Iacobone, Anna D.
• Bagella, Maria Paola
• Pietri, Roberto
• Martinelli, Marianna
• Marrazzu, Adriano
• Sonne, Si Brask
• Ghi, Maria Eugenia
• Piana, Andrea F.
• Pedersen, Helle
• Giubbi, Chiara

Abstract

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title /><jats:p>This study assessed the accuracy of high-risk human papillomavirus testing of BD Onclarity HPV (Onclarity) assay on vaginal self-collected FLOQSwab versus cervical samples to ensure similar accuracy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Testing was performed on two automated platforms, BD Viper LT and BD COR, to evaluate the effect of machine and using two vaginal self-samples to analyze the influence of collection, transport, and freezing-unfreezing on the results. A cervical sample and two self-samples were collected from 300 women. The first collected vaginal and the cervical sample were tested on BD Viper LT, and the second swab was frozen and subsequently tested on both automated systems. Test results on vaginal and cervical specimens were considered the index and comparator, respectively; colposcopy and histology were reference standards. Relative sensitivity for ≥CIN2 on vaginal samples analyzed versus the cervical sample was 1.01 (0.97–1.06), 1.01 (0.97–1.06), and 1.00 (0.95–1.05), for the first, second self-collected sample tested on BD VIPER LT, and second self-collected sample tested on BD COR, respectively. Relative specificity was 0.83 (0.73–0.94), 0.76 (0.67–0.87), and 0.82 (0.73–0.92) using the three different workflows. Cut-off optimization for human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity defined at Ct ≤38.3 for HPV16, ≤ 34.2 for HPV18, and ≤31.5 for all other types showed an increased relative specificity with similar sensitivity. No significant difference was observed between self-samples tested with the two platforms and between first- and second-collected swabs. Onclarity assay on FLOQSwab using both platforms showed similar sensitivity but lower specificity to detect ≥CIN2 compared to cervical samples. By cut-off optimization, non-inferior specificity could be reached.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>IMPORTANCE</jats:title><jats:p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected vaginal samples has been shown to improve women’s participation to cervical cancer screening programs, particularly in regions with limited access to health care. Nevertheless, the introduction of self-sampling in cervical cancer screening programs requires prior clinical validation of the HPV assay in combination with a self-sample collection device, including also the laboratory workflow and automation required for high-throughput testing in screening. In this study, the performance of BD Onclarity HPV on FLOQSwab-collected vaginal self-samples has been compared to clinician-taken liquid-based cytology samples, to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using two high-throughput platforms, BD Viper LT and BD COR. The study findings have shown a similar performance of BD Onclarity on testing self-collected samples, confirming the validation of the proposed pre-analytical and analytical protocols for their use in cervical cancer screening programs based on self-collected vaginal samples.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics

• size-exclusion chromatography