Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Brown, C.

  • Google
  • 7
  • 43
  • 213

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2022Frequency-controlled dielectrophoresis-driven wetting of nematic liquid crystals4citations
  • 2021Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-Throughput Drive-Through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts. 136citations
  • 2016Mn(dca)2(o-phen) {dca = dicyanamide; O-phen = 1,10-phenanthroline}: Long-range magnetic order in a low-dimensional Mn-dca polymer8citations
  • 2016Indentation stiffness does not discriminate between normal and degraded articular cartilage.25citations
  • 2015Money makes the (medical assessment) world go round: How costly is an OSCE?citations
  • 2014Electronic correlations in FeGa3 and the effect of hole doping on its magnetic properties37citations
  • 2011Simultaneous detection of HFE C282Y, H63D and S65C mutations associated with type 1 haemochromatosis using a multiplex luminex bead assay.3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Saxena, A.
1 / 8 shared
Edwards, A.
1 / 1 shared
Bhadwal, A.
1 / 1 shared
Sage, I.
1 / 1 shared
Mottram, N.
1 / 1 shared
Perez, G.
1 / 11 shared
Moran, A.
1 / 2 shared
Pollock, Nira
1 / 1 shared
Volinsky, L.
1 / 1 shared
Sc, Smole
1 / 1 shared
Lc, Madoff
1 / 1 shared
Nj, Lennon
1 / 1 shared
Smith, S.
1 / 9 shared
Patel, P.
1 / 10 shared
Carroll, M.
1 / 2 shared
Scarry, A.
1 / 1 shared
Gabriel, S.
1 / 3 shared
Cy, Okane
1 / 1 shared
Tj, Roady
1 / 1 shared
Ae, Cranston
1 / 1 shared
Jr, Jacobs
1 / 1 shared
Tran, K.
1 / 1 shared
Singleton, J.
1 / 16 shared
Schlueter, J.
1 / 8 shared
Blundell, S.
1 / 33 shared
Huang, Q.
1 / 22 shared
Manson, J.
1 / 5 shared
Pratt, F.
1 / 14 shared
Lancaster, T.
1 / 23 shared
Lynn, J.
1 / 1 shared
Crawford, R.
1 / 1 shared
Oloyede, A.
1 / 1 shared
Walsh, Kieran
1 / 1 shared
Ross, Sarah
1 / 1 shared
Cleland, Jen
1 / 1 shared
Puri, A.
1 / 4 shared
Tomczak, J. M.
1 / 4 shared
Gamza, M. B.
1 / 1 shared
Kotliar, G.
1 / 1 shared
Aronson, M. C.
1 / 1 shared
Patel, R.
1 / 7 shared
Sp, Cardoso
1 / 1 shared
Navarrete, C.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2016
2015
2014
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Saxena, A.
  • Edwards, A.
  • Bhadwal, A.
  • Sage, I.
  • Mottram, N.
  • Perez, G.
  • Moran, A.
  • Pollock, Nira
  • Volinsky, L.
  • Sc, Smole
  • Lc, Madoff
  • Nj, Lennon
  • Smith, S.
  • Patel, P.
  • Carroll, M.
  • Scarry, A.
  • Gabriel, S.
  • Cy, Okane
  • Tj, Roady
  • Ae, Cranston
  • Jr, Jacobs
  • Tran, K.
  • Singleton, J.
  • Schlueter, J.
  • Blundell, S.
  • Huang, Q.
  • Manson, J.
  • Pratt, F.
  • Lancaster, T.
  • Lynn, J.
  • Crawford, R.
  • Oloyede, A.
  • Walsh, Kieran
  • Ross, Sarah
  • Cleland, Jen
  • Puri, A.
  • Tomczak, J. M.
  • Gamza, M. B.
  • Kotliar, G.
  • Aronson, M. C.
  • Patel, R.
  • Sp, Cardoso
  • Navarrete, C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-Throughput Drive-Through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts.

  • Perez, G.
  • Moran, A.
  • Pollock, Nira
  • Volinsky, L.
  • Sc, Smole
  • Lc, Madoff
  • Nj, Lennon
  • Smith, S.
  • Patel, P.
  • Carroll, M.
  • Scarry, A.
  • Gabriel, S.
  • Brown, C.
  • Cy, Okane
  • Tj, Roady
  • Ae, Cranston
  • Jr, Jacobs
  • Tran, K.
Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (Ag) that can be performed at point of care (POC) can supplement molecular testing and help mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Deployment of an Ag RDT requires an understanding of its operational and performance characteristics under real-world conditions and in relevant subpopulations. We evaluated the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card in a high-throughput, drive-through, free community testing site in Massachusetts using anterior nasal (AN) swab reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) for clinical testing. Individuals presenting for molecular testing in two of seven lanes were offered the opportunity to also receive BinaxNOW testing. Dual AN swabs were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic children (≤18 years of age) and adults. BinaxNOW testing was performed in a testing pod with temperature/humidity monitoring. One individual performed testing and official result reporting for each test, but most tests had a second independent reading to assess interoperator agreement. Positive BinaxNOW results were scored as faint, medium, or strong. Positive BinaxNOW results were reported to patients by phone, and they were instructed to isolate pending RT-PCR results. The paired RT-PCR result was the reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations. Of 2,482 participants, 1,380 adults and 928 children had paired RT-PCR/BinaxNOW results and complete symptom data. In this study, 974/1,380 (71%) adults and 829/928 (89%) children were asymptomatic. BinaxNOW had 96.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.0 to 99.3) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI, 98.6 to 100.0) specificity in adults within 7 days of symptoms and 84.6% (95% CI, 65.1 to 95.6) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI, 94.5 to 100.0) specificity in children within 7 days of symptoms. Sensitivity and specificity in asymptomatic adults were 70.2% (95% CI, 56.6 to 81.6) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.9 to 99.9), respectively, and in asymptomatic children, they were 65.4% (95% CI, 55.6 to 74.4) and 99.0% (95% CI, 98.0 to 99.6), respectively. By cycle threshold (CT ) value cutoff, sensitivity in all subgroups combined (n = 292 RT-PCR-positive individuals) was 99.3% with CT values of ≤25, 95.8% with CT values of ≤30, and 81.2% with CT values of ≤35. Twelve false-positive BinaxNOW results (out of 2,308 tests) were observed; in all 12, the test bands were faint but otherwise normal and were noted by both readers. One invalid BinaxNOW result was identified. Interoperator agreement (positive versus negative BinaxNOW result) was 100% (n = 2,230/2,230 double reads). Each operator was able to process 20 RDTs per hour. In a separate set of 30 specimens (from individuals with symptoms ≤7 days) run at temperatures below the manufacturer's recommended range (46 to 58.5°F), sensitivity was 66.7% and specificity 95.2%. BinaxNOW had very high specificity in both adults and children and very high sensitivity in newly symptomatic adults. Overall, 95.8% sensitivity was observed with CT values of ≤30. These data support public health recommendations for use of the BinaxNOW test in adults with symptoms for ≤7 days without RT-PCR confirmation. Excellent interoperator agreement indicates that an individual can perform and read the BinaxNOW test alone. A skilled laboratorian can perform and read 20 tests per hour. Careful attention to temperature is critical.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • chemical ionisation