Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Browaeys, Julien

  • Google
  • 2
  • 10
  • 34

Université Paris Cité

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021Shear-banding fluid(s) under time-dependent shear flows. Part II: A test of the Moorcroft–Fielding criteria8citations
  • 2002Local rheological probes for complex fluids: Application to Laponite suspensions26citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Py, Charlotte
1 / 1 shared
Casanellas, Laura
1 / 1 shared
Lerouge, Sandra
1 / 1 shared
Cardoso, Olivier
1 / 1 shared
Briole, Alice
1 / 1 shared
Fardin, Marc-Antoine
1 / 1 shared
Elias, Florence
1 / 1 shared
Wilhelm, Claire
1 / 12 shared
Ponton, Alain
1 / 5 shared
Bacri, Jean-Claude
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Py, Charlotte
  • Casanellas, Laura
  • Lerouge, Sandra
  • Cardoso, Olivier
  • Briole, Alice
  • Fardin, Marc-Antoine
  • Elias, Florence
  • Wilhelm, Claire
  • Ponton, Alain
  • Bacri, Jean-Claude
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Shear-banding fluid(s) under time-dependent shear flows. Part II: A test of the Moorcroft–Fielding criteria

  • Py, Charlotte
  • Casanellas, Laura
  • Lerouge, Sandra
  • Cardoso, Olivier
  • Browaeys, Julien
  • Briole, Alice
  • Fardin, Marc-Antoine
Abstract

International audience ; Complex systems often exhibit shear banding-the coexistence of two different states characterized by their internal structuring and local shear rates. For some of them, the heterogeneous flow corresponds to the final steady state response while for others, shear banding can only be transient, the banding structure healing back to homogeneous flow in the ultimate steady state after long-lived periods. In order to explain the diversity of observations, Moorcroft and Fielding have established general criteria for the onset of banding in time-dependent flows of complex systems, ranging from polymeric fluids to soft glassy materials [Moorcroft et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 110, 086001]. The proposed criteria are based on the time evolution of the bulk rheological response function of the system to a given time-dependent flow protocol and are associated with a specific signature in the mechanical response. In this contribution, we test the validity of these criteria in the case of two common time-dependent flow protocols: a step stress and a shear startup. Two types of fluids are examined. On the one hand, a wormlike micelles system exhibiting steady shear banding is studied experimentally, using rheometry coupled with direct visualisations and particle image velocimetry. On the other hand, we analyse previous literature on yield stress fluids exhibiting transient shear banding. Under creep flow, for both types of fluids the onset of banding arises in a time window compatible with the Moorcroft-Fielding criterion. However, the mechanical signature, i.e. the shape of the bulk mechanical signal as a function of time is not the one expected within some of the specific models with which the general Moorcroft-Fielding criteria were tested numerically. Under shear startup, both types of fluids behave differently. The criterion holds for yield stress fluids, the onset of banding arising just after the stress overshoot, as expected. On the contrary, for wormlike micelles the window of instability is ...

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mass spectrometry
  • creep
  • rheometry