| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Leighton, Timothy
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (11/11 displayed)
- 2019Group behavioral responses of juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio) to pulsed tonal stimuli in the presence of masking noisecitations
- 2017Ultrasonic activated stream cleaning of a range of materials
- 2016An activated fluid stream – new techniques for cold water cleaningcitations
- 2016A comparison of ultrasonically activated water stream and ultrasonic bath immersion cleaning of railhead leaf-film contaminantcitations
- 2015The acoustic bubble: oceanic bubble acoustics and ultrasonic cleaningcitations
- 2014Bubble acoustics
- 2013A new approach to ultrasonic cleaningcitations
- 2010Cluster collapse in a cylindrical cell: correlating multibubble sonoluminescence, acoustic pressure, and erosioncitations
- 2007Studies into the detection of buried objects (particularly optical fibres) in saturated sediment. Part 2: design and commissioning of test tank
- 2007Studies into the detection of buried objects (particularly optical fibres) in saturated sediment. Part 5: an acousto-optic detection system
- 2007Cavitation, shockwaves and electrochemistry: an experimental and theoretical approach to a complex environment
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
A new approach to ultrasonic cleaning
Abstract
Traditional ultrasonic cleaning baths are limited in that they cannot clean objects that are too large to fit in the bath, and cannot be taken to objects with complex geometries in order to ?clean in place?. Furthermore the object to be cleaned sits in a ?soup? of contaminated liquid, and whilst cavitation fields can be set up under test conditions, immersion of the object to be cleaned can significantly degrade the bath?s performance by disrupting the sound field. An alternative technique, which does not use ultrasound is the commercial pressure- or powerwasher, where high speed jets of water and cleaning agent are pumped onto a surface. Although these can ?clean in place?, they pump large volumes of water, and produce significant volumes of contaminated run-off and contaminated aerosol, both of which are hazards for secondary contamination of users and water supplies. The momentum of the water and pump requirements mean they are difficult to scale up. This paper specifies a low volume flow technique for ultrasonic cleaning in place, benefits being that it operates with low flow rates (1-2 litres per minute), and there is no need to expend energy on heating the water.