Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Feigl, Gandolf

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Comparative analysis of fabrication techniques for sensing windows on silicon nitride waveguide platformscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Schmidt, Christoph
1 / 2 shared
Kraft, Jochen
1 / 3 shared
Hinum-Wagner, Jakob Wilhelm
1 / 1 shared
Bergmann, Alexander
1 / 15 shared
Morecroft, Deborah
1 / 1 shared
Hoermann, Samuel Marko
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Schmidt, Christoph
  • Kraft, Jochen
  • Hinum-Wagner, Jakob Wilhelm
  • Bergmann, Alexander
  • Morecroft, Deborah
  • Hoermann, Samuel Marko
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Comparative analysis of fabrication techniques for sensing windows on silicon nitride waveguide platforms

  • Schmidt, Christoph
  • Kraft, Jochen
  • Hinum-Wagner, Jakob Wilhelm
  • Bergmann, Alexander
  • Morecroft, Deborah
  • Feigl, Gandolf
  • Hoermann, Samuel Marko
Abstract

<p>This study provides an in-depth evaluation of two fundamental techniques for fabricating sensing windows on silicon nitride platforms: a traditional etching strategy using reactive ion etching (RIE) combined with wet etching, and a lift-off-based process in which the top cladding material is deposited onto a suitable resist which is subsequently stripped of the distinct sensing waveguides. The analysis, based on a side-by-side comparison, meticulously examines the effectiveness of these methods. Key evaluation metrics include propagation and bending loss in the sensing windows, process robustness, and uniformity of critical dimensions and heights across the wafer. This will provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and potential application limitations of each technique. An integral part of the study is the careful revision of the waveguide material stack to address specific challenges and applications. This precise tuning and adaptation of the material stack serve as a proxy for the demands likely to be encountered in real-world applications. The conservative etching technique has the advantage that it can be easily combined with subsequent facet etching processes for edge coupling approaches. Conversely, the lift-off resist based approach, despite its relative complexity and sensitivity to high-temperature deposition on the resist, reduces the negative impact of the process on surface roughness and sidewall angles. The knowledge gained from this research provides valuable guidance in the selection of appropriate fabrication techniques for specific silicon nitride sensor applications to increase the robustness of the processing steps for potential mass production stability.</p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • nitride
  • strength
  • Silicon
  • plasma etching
  • wet etching