People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Clare, Anthony S.
Newcastle University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (7/7 displayed)
- 2022Optimizing fouling resistance of poly(sulfabetaine)s through backbone and charge separationcitations
- 2021In Vitro Oxidative Crosslinking of Recombinant Barnacle Cyprid Cement Gland Proteinscitations
- 2020Engineered Chemical Nanotopographies:Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain-Transfer Mediated Grafting of Anisotropic Poly(acrylamide) Patterns on Poly(dimethylsiloxane) to Modulate Marine Biofoulingcitations
- 2020Effect of dipole orientation in mixed, charge-equilibrated self-assembled monolayers on protein adsorption and marine biofoulingcitations
- 2019Antifouling and fouling-release performance of photo-embossed fluorogel elastomerscitations
- 2017Multivariate analysis of attachment of biofouling organisms in response to material surface characteristicscitations
- 2016Charged hydrophilic polymer brushes and their relevance for understanding marine biofoulingcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Multivariate analysis of attachment of biofouling organisms in response to material surface characteristics
Abstract
<jats:p>Multivariate analyses were used to investigate the influence of selected surface properties (Owens–Wendt surface energy and its dispersive and polar components, static water contact angle, conceptual sign of the surface charge, zeta potentials) on the attachment patterns of five biofouling organisms (Amphibalanus amphitrite, Amphibalanus improvisus, Bugula neritina, Ulva linza, and Navicula incerta) to better understand what surface properties drive attachment across multiple fouling organisms. A library of ten xerogel coatings and a glass standard provided a range of values for the selected surface properties to compare to biofouling attachment patterns. Results from the surface characterization and biological assays were analyzed separately and in combination using multivariate statistical methods. Principal coordinate analysis of the surface property characterization and the biological assays resulted in different groupings of the xerogel coatings. In particular, the biofouling organisms were able to distinguish four coatings that were not distinguishable by the surface properties of this study. The authors used canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) to identify surface properties governing attachment across all five biofouling species. The CAP pointed to surface energy and surface charge as important drivers of patterns in biological attachment, but also suggested that differentiation of the surfaces was influenced to a comparable or greater extent by the dispersive component of surface energy.</jats:p>