Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kuutti, Juha

  • Google
  • 17
  • 28
  • 35

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (17/17 displayed)

  • 2024Constraint effects on fracture toughness of ductile cast iron in the ductile regime1citations
  • 2022Effect of Welding Direction and Bead Pattern in Alloy 52 / SA508 Repair Weldcitations
  • 2022Sensitivity of the Master Curve reference temperature T0 to the crack front curvature6citations
  • 2022Miniature C(T) Specimens-Pinhole Eccentricity and the Effect of Crack Opening Displacement Measurement Location1citations
  • 2021Evaluation of an Alloy 52 / Cladded Carbon Steel Repair Weld by Cold Metal Transfercitations
  • 2021Online nonlinear ultrasound imaging of crack closure during thermal fatigue loading4citations
  • 2020Numerical assessment of the effects of microcrack interaction in AM components3citations
  • 2020A52M/SA502 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld:Evaluation of different techniquescitations
  • 2020A52M/SA502 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weldcitations
  • 2020A52M/SA52 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld:Experimental Evaluation and Post-Weld Characterizations1citations
  • 2020A52M/SA52 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld : Experimental Evaluation and Post-Weld Characterizations1citations
  • 2018Comparison of ASME XI and BS7910 Allowable Surface Flaw Size Evaluation Procedures in Piping Components2citations
  • 2017Use of CTOD as crack driving force parameter for low-cycle thermal fatiguecitations
  • 2013Disposal canister shock absorber tests and analysiscitations
  • 2012A local remeshing procedure to simulate crack propagation in quasi-brittle materials16citations
  • 2011Fracture Assessment of Reactor Circuit (FRAS):Advanced numerical fracture assessment methodscitations
  • 2010Simulation of ice crushing experiment using FE-model update techniquecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lindqvist, Sebastian
2 / 23 shared
Forsström, Antti
1 / 9 shared
Sirkiä, Laura
1 / 4 shared
Huotilainen, Caitlin
4 / 14 shared
Keinänen, Heikki
5 / 14 shared
Virkkunen, Iikka
8 / 22 shared
Bhusare, Suprit
1 / 2 shared
Nevasmaa, Pekka
6 / 44 shared
Hytönen, Noora
1 / 13 shared
Mohanty, Gaurav
3 / 33 shared
Lambai, Aloshious
3 / 11 shared
Virkkunen, I.
1 / 2 shared
Sirkiä, L.
1 / 2 shared
Sirén, Henrik
4 / 4 shared
Koskinen, Tuomas
1 / 4 shared
Rinta-Aho, Jari
1 / 2 shared
Kolari, Kari
3 / 13 shared
Peltonen, Mikko
4 / 5 shared
Honkanen, Mari
2 / 22 shared
Keinanen, Heikki
1 / 1 shared
Siren, Henrik
1 / 1 shared
Oinonen, Ahti
1 / 2 shared
Fortino, Stefania
1 / 13 shared
Heinonen, Jaakko
1 / 6 shared
Hakola, Ilkka
1 / 1 shared
Andersson, Tom
1 / 51 shared
Laukkanen, Anssi
1 / 144 shared
Karjalainen-Roikonen, Päivi
1 / 15 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2021
2020
2018
2017
2013
2012
2011
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lindqvist, Sebastian
  • Forsström, Antti
  • Sirkiä, Laura
  • Huotilainen, Caitlin
  • Keinänen, Heikki
  • Virkkunen, Iikka
  • Bhusare, Suprit
  • Nevasmaa, Pekka
  • Hytönen, Noora
  • Mohanty, Gaurav
  • Lambai, Aloshious
  • Virkkunen, I.
  • Sirkiä, L.
  • Sirén, Henrik
  • Koskinen, Tuomas
  • Rinta-Aho, Jari
  • Kolari, Kari
  • Peltonen, Mikko
  • Honkanen, Mari
  • Keinanen, Heikki
  • Siren, Henrik
  • Oinonen, Ahti
  • Fortino, Stefania
  • Heinonen, Jaakko
  • Hakola, Ilkka
  • Andersson, Tom
  • Laukkanen, Anssi
  • Karjalainen-Roikonen, Päivi
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A52M/SA502 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld

  • Peltonen, Mikko
  • Keinänen, Heikki
  • Virkkunen, Iikka
  • Sirén, Henrik
  • Nevasmaa, Pekka
  • Kuutti, Juha
Abstract

As part of nuclear power plant ageing management, the increased probability of a need of repair welding must be taken into account along with the increase of plant lifetime. An essential prerequisite for successful and safe repair welding is that the applied welding procedures have been properly validated and qualified prior to their use. For instance, if no post-weld heat treatment can be performed and the desired tempering effect has to be based on temper-bead technique, a user needs to scan among several available repair welding procedures. A decision has to be made which of the procedures provides the maximum desired tempering effect with the case in question. This research is a part of a larger experimental effort developing repair welding techniques, and is a part of the Finnish Nuclear Power Plant Safety Research Programme SAFIR2022. The currently studied experimental repair welding case is a low-alloy steel mock-up with an austenitic cladding. Repair welding is assumed to represent a 'worst-case' scenario where a postulated linear crack-like defect exists beneath the cladding and might extend across the interface into the reactor pressure vessel steel side. This postulated defect will be removed by machining, and the thereby machined groove will be filled by repair welding using a nickel-base super alloy 52M filler metal by cold metal transfer-gas metal arc welding with a robotic arm. In this paper, different repair welding techniques and alternatives are shortly surveyed based on existing literature. Overall, published documentation was sparse. While only few studies were considered relevant in terms of established links to actual repair cases of under-cladding defects in reactor pressure vessels, others were mainly for modelling and simulation purposes without e.g. cladding groove preparation or the use of irradiation-embrittled material. Most of these procedures were based on the use of nickel-base alloy filler metal in the combination with temper-bead welding technique, with the aim at omitting both preheating and post-weld heat treatment. The main challenge in the repair weld design is to optimise all relevant welding parameters, including the thermal efficiency of temper-bead welding, in order to obtain a sound, defect-free weld with controlled reactor pressure vessel steel heat affected zone maximum hardness. In the simulations presented in the paper, the goal was to compute the resulting deformations, strains and stresses induced by the repair process and make a-priori estimates of the effectiveness of different repair techniques based on the numerical predictions. The numerical analyses allow the comparison of the procedures and enable selecting the one with most efficient combination of weld thermal cycles in terms of tempering and normalisation effects. The prediction of prevailing residual stresses is also important when further application of the component is considered. The paper is followed by Part II, in which the topics of experimental evaluation and material characterization of the repair weld are presented.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • nickel
  • simulation
  • crack
  • steel
  • hardness
  • aging
  • tempering