People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Knowles, David M.
University of Bristol
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2024A correlative approach to evaluating the links between local microstructural parameters and creep initiated cavitiescitations
- 2024Productive Automation of Calibration Processes for Crystal Plasticity Model Parameters via Reinforcement Learningcitations
- 2024Calibration and surrogate model-based sensitivity analysis of crystal plasticity finite element models
- 2024Towards a Data-Driven Evolutionary Model of the Cyclic Behaviour of Austenitic Steels
- 2024Effect of grain boundary misorientation and carbide precipitation on damage initiationcitations
- 2023Exploring 3D X-Ray Diffraction Method to Validate Approaches in Materials Modelling
- 2022A method to extract slip system dependent information for crystal plasticity modelscitations
- 2022The effects of internal stresses on the creep deformation investigated using in-situ synchrotron diffraction and crystal plasticity modellingcitations
- 2021Comparing Techniques for Quantification of Creep Cavities
- 2021The role of grain boundary ferrite evolution and thermal aging on creep cavitation of type 316H austenitic stainless steelcitations
- 2021Evaluation of fracture toughness and residual stress in AISI 316L electron beam weldscitations
- 2020Microstructure-informed, predictive crystal plasticity finite element model of fatigue-dwellscitations
- 2020A novel insight into the primary creep regeneration behaviour of a polycrystalline material at high-temperature using in-situ neutron diffractioncitations
- 2020A novel insight into the primary creep regeneration behaviour of a polycrystalline material at high-temperature using in-situ neutron diffractioncitations
- 2020The role of grain boundary orientation and secondary phases in creep cavity nucleation of a 316h boiler headercitations
- 2019Effect of Plasticity on Creep Deformation in Type 316h Stainless Steel
- 2019Development of Fatigue Testing System for in-situ Observation of Stainless Steel 316 by HS-AFM & SEMcitations
- 2018Influence of prior cyclic plasticity on creep deformation using crystal plasticity modellingcitations
- 2018Comparison of predicted cyclic creep damage from a multi-material weldment FEA model and the traditional r5 volume 2/3 weldment approach
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Comparison of predicted cyclic creep damage from a multi-material weldment FEA model and the traditional r5 volume 2/3 weldment approach
Abstract
The R5 assessment procedure for Integrity of High Temperature Structures employs a Weld Strain Enhancement Factor (WSEF) (dependent only upon classified weld type) for predicting creep fatigue crack initiation at weldments (V2/3 Appendix 4). This serves to amplify the calculated total strain at the weld toe for full penetration welds to account for geometric concentration and material mismatch between weldment zones. The value of WSEF recommended for fillet welds was derived from a review of a limited number of tests on thin welds which were not wholly representative of a typical fillet weld.<br/><br/>The objective of this paper is to present a comparison of the predicted cyclic creep defect initiation damage at a fillet weld toe using a multi-material finite element (FE) model of the weldment, against the damage predicted using the traditional R5 V2/3 approach, which uses only the parent material properties to derive the weld toe strain range in combination with the WSEF. In this example, the fillet weld joins a high temperature tube to an anti-vibration strap. There is pressure loading in the tube and displacement loading due to thermal expansion.<br/><br/>The FE model incorporates material properties associated with both the parent and the weld metal, including elastic modulus, plastic yield properties, creep deformation, and creep ductility (to determine damage via ductility exhaustion). The finite element analysis is run for 30 cycles (pressure and thermal cycling) with an average dwell period of 736 hours, with predicted damages for 100 cycles estimated using extrapolation. Sensitivities considering the stress-strain properties of the weld are included.<br/>