Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Grime, Andrew

  • Google
  • 4
  • 3
  • 34

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2022An efficient probabilistic framework for the long-term fatigue assessment of large diameter steel risers11citations
  • 2021A Bayesian machine learning approach to rapidly quantifying the fatigue probability of failure for steel catenary risers19citations
  • 2018Assessing the Impact of Riser-Soil Interaction Model on the Fatigue Life of Large Diameter SCRs4citations
  • 2018An ANN-based framework for rapid spectral fatigue analysis of steel catenary riserscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Efthymiou, Mike
3 / 3 shared
Randolph, Mark
3 / 10 shared
Hejazi, Rasoul
3 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Efthymiou, Mike
  • Randolph, Mark
  • Hejazi, Rasoul
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Assessing the Impact of Riser-Soil Interaction Model on the Fatigue Life of Large Diameter SCRs

  • Grime, Andrew
Abstract

<jats:p>This paper investigates the effect of riser-soil interaction model selection on the assessment of steel catenary riser (SCR) fatigue life for realistic environmental conditions at a deep-water Australian North west shelf (NWS) site. Using a fatigue wave scatter diagram consisting of 100 metocean conditions at the site (combining irregular seas, swell and current), a dynamic time-domain finite element analysis is coupled with the rain-flow cycle counting algorithm in order to determine the fatigue life of SCRs due to first-order motions of the host floater. Rigid, linear elastic and nonlinear riser-soil interaction models are used in order to assess the impact of model selection on the fatigue life of example deep-water SCRs of varying diameter. It is shown that the use of a nonlinear riser-soil interaction model for a representative deep-water NWS site can give an almost two-fold increase in SCR fatigue life over a stiff linear seabed assumption, albeit at a significant computational expense. It is further shown that a recently developed method for calculating equivalent linear soil stiffness may be used in place of the computationally expensive nonlinear approach in order to estimate SCR fatigue life to a reasonable level of accuracy. A methodology for applying the equivalent linear stiffness method to irregular sea-states is proposed and general insight into the selection of the most appropriate soil-riser interaction model for the fatigue analysis of large diameter deep-water SCRs is provided.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • steel
  • fatigue
  • finite element analysis