Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Radhakrishnan, Arjun

  • Google
  • 8
  • 25
  • 30

University of Bristol

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2024Effect of pre-curing on thermoplastic-thermoset interphases1citations
  • 2023A Feasibility Study for Additively Manufactured Composite Toolingcitations
  • 2023Manufacturing Multi-Matrix Compositescitations
  • 2023Additively manufactured cure tools for composites manufacture2citations
  • 2023The influence of key processing parameters on thermoset laminate curing2citations
  • 2022Tracking consolidation of out-of-autoclave prepreg corners using pressure sensors8citations
  • 2022A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED COMPOSITE TOOLINGcitations
  • 2019Matrix-graded and fibre-steered composites to tackle stress concentrations17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kratz, James
6 / 46 shared
Fisher, Adam A. J.
2 / 3 shared
Teuwen, Julie
1 / 4 shared
Levy, Arthur
2 / 10 shared
Dhokia, Vimal
3 / 29 shared
Maes, Vincent Karel
2 / 7 shared
Valero, Maria D. R.
2 / 2 shared
Pegg, Elise Catherine
2 / 11 shared
Valentine, Max D. A.
2 / 3 shared
Ivanov, Dmitry S.
2 / 31 shared
Shaffer, Milo
2 / 9 shared
Hamerton, Ian
2 / 113 shared
Georgilas, Ioannis
1 / 2 shared
Maes, Vincent K.
1 / 3 shared
Sykes, Stuart
1 / 1 shared
Hartley, Jamie
1 / 2 shared
Maes, Vincent
1 / 2 shared
Valentine, Max
1 / 1 shared
Valero, Maria
1 / 1 shared
Pegg, Elise
1 / 1 shared
Roy, Sree Shankhachur
1 / 8 shared
Potluri, Prasad
1 / 85 shared
Stanier, David
1 / 1 shared
Scarpa, Fabrizio
1 / 100 shared
Gent, Ian
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kratz, James
  • Fisher, Adam A. J.
  • Teuwen, Julie
  • Levy, Arthur
  • Dhokia, Vimal
  • Maes, Vincent Karel
  • Valero, Maria D. R.
  • Pegg, Elise Catherine
  • Valentine, Max D. A.
  • Ivanov, Dmitry S.
  • Shaffer, Milo
  • Hamerton, Ian
  • Georgilas, Ioannis
  • Maes, Vincent K.
  • Sykes, Stuart
  • Hartley, Jamie
  • Maes, Vincent
  • Valentine, Max
  • Valero, Maria
  • Pegg, Elise
  • Roy, Sree Shankhachur
  • Potluri, Prasad
  • Stanier, David
  • Scarpa, Fabrizio
  • Gent, Ian
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A Feasibility Study for Additively Manufactured Composite Tooling

  • Kratz, James
  • Dhokia, Vimal
  • Maes, Vincent Karel
  • Valero, Maria D. R.
  • Pegg, Elise Catherine
  • Radhakrishnan, Arjun
  • Valentine, Max D. A.
Abstract

As the flexibility and reliability of additive manufacturing (AM) and its corresponding design tools increases, it is becoming a viable option for more industries. One application area that could benefit from AM is composite component manufacture. The layup and molding of composite materials face significant challenges presented by tight design timescales, growing demand for productivity, and the complexity of components and end products. Therefore, there is an immediate potential to save energy by reducing the mass of the curing equipment and tooling to enhance process heat transmission. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the reduction of embodied energy within mold tools that are printed using an AM process. Using an AM approach, it is possible to design lightweight curing tools to increase the curing rate and quality of heat distribution in the mold. The viability of additively producing these cure tools was assessed by analyzing the geometrical precision of the composite mold outputs, material utilization, and heat transmission qualities of each sample. In this study, 14 cure tools were designed and manufactured with a 100 mm2 curing surface area, top plate thickness of 1–2 mm, and stiffening lattices behind the curing surface with a depth of 10 mm. Four lattice geometries, gyroid, dual-wall gyroid, planar diamond, and stochastic, were tested based on their overall geometrical accuracy and thermal responsiveness. While the stochastic lattice had the best single tool properties, the planar diamond and gyroid lattice tools had better potential for future use in the design of additively manufactured composite tooling.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • composite
  • additive manufacturing
  • curing
  • gyroid