Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bushra, Jannatul

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Enhancing Design Guidelines for Metal Powder Bed Fusion: Analyzing Geometric Features to Improve Part Quality1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Falcon, Pablo Luna
1 / 1 shared
Budinoff, Hannah D.
1 / 1 shared
Latypov, Marat
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Falcon, Pablo Luna
  • Budinoff, Hannah D.
  • Latypov, Marat
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Enhancing Design Guidelines for Metal Powder Bed Fusion: Analyzing Geometric Features to Improve Part Quality

  • Falcon, Pablo Luna
  • Budinoff, Hannah D.
  • Latypov, Marat
  • Bushra, Jannatul
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Additive manufacturing (AM) part quality relies on many factors, including part geometry that impacts both the manufacturability and resulting dimensional accuracy of the part. To improve the dimensional accuracy of AM parts, data-driven approaches can be utilized to explore the effect of different process parameters on both simple and complex geometries. However, to provide general design guidelines, it is necessary to develop models and tools that accurately predict geometry-driven distortion across a broad range of geometries, while also being user-interpretable. Identifying and analyzing common part features that contribute to geometrical deviations and using them to design better parts could improve AM part quality. In this paper, a Gaussian process regression surrogate model was trained using 21 geometric features (selected from a set of 92 shape descriptors) from 324 different axisymmetric parts to predict maximum part distortion and identify the features that impact part distortion the most. Validated high-fidelity finite element analysis simulations were used to determine the maximum distortion corresponding to each part. Our results show the surrogate model approach can accurately predict part distortion, with a predictive error of approximately 0.07 mm for the testing set. The findings of this study can have implications for the exploration of new part designs by adjusting these identified features or incorporating them as design rules in AM product designs.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • finite element analysis
  • powder bed fusion