| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Marques, Mj
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2022Comparative Study of the Wear Behavior of B4C Monolayered and CrN/CrCN/DLC Multilayered Physical Vapor Deposition Coatings Under High Contact Loads: An Experimental Analysiscitations
- 2022Quantification of Residual Stress Relief by Heat Treatments in Austenitic Cladded Layerscitations
- 2021Rolling and Rolling-Sliding Contact Fatigue Failure Mechanisms in 32 CrMoV 13 Nitrided Steel-An Experimental Studycitations
- 2020Comparison between EDM and grinding machining on fatigue behaviour of AISI D2 tool steelcitations
- 2017Texture characterization of stainless steel cladded layers of process vesselscitations
- 2015Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and residual stress fields of a weld multilayer austenitic steel cladcitations
- 2014Residual Stresses Profiles of Cladded Austenitic Stainless Steel Evaluated by X-Ray Diffraction and by Incremental Hole-Drilling Method
- 2013The Use of Neutron Diffraction for the Determination of the in-Depth Residual Stresses Profile in Weld Coatingscitations
- 2012Evaluation of stress-strain behavior of surface treated steels by X-ray diffractioncitations
- 2012Design and manufacture of a composite bus
- 2012RESIDUAL STRESSES PROFILES OF CLADDED AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL BY INCREMENTAL HOLE DRILLING METHOD
- 2011Residual Stress Fields after Heat Treatment in Cladded Steel of Process Vesselscitations
- 2006Surface integrity of H13 ESR mould steel milled by carbide and CBN toolscitations
- 2005X-ray diffraction characterization of ion-implanted austenitic stainless steelcitations
- 2002Relaxation of residual stresses on the near surface of carbon steel substrates due to plasma cleaning
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Comparative Study of the Wear Behavior of B4C Monolayered and CrN/CrCN/DLC Multilayered Physical Vapor Deposition Coatings Under High Contact Loads: An Experimental Analysis
Abstract
There are several ways to characterize the wear resistance of coatings in the laboratory, almost all of them applying relatively low contact pressure, both punctually and over surface contact. Pin-on-disc, reciprocal sliding, and micro-abrasion wear tests are quite common configurations for this purpose. Thus, a gap was identified in terms of characterization of hard physical vapor deposition (PVD) coatings subject to higher levels of contact pressure. This study aims to study and compare the wear behavior of two different coatings made by PVD, a B4C (Boron Carbide) monolayer, less used, and another following a multilayer structure of CrN/CrCN/DLC, to identify the wear mechanisms involved in quite different coatings. Both coatings were initially characterized in terms of chemical composition, thickness, morphology, structure, hardness, and adhesion to the substrate, being subsequently tested in laboratory equipment for wear tests following the block-on-ring configuration and relatively high levels of contact pressure, with a view to study the failure mechanisms of the coatings and their wearrate. CrN/CrCN/DLC multilayered coatings presented a better overall wear behavior, whereas B4C coating showed a good wear behavior regarding the load and configuration used, but in line with the behavior already observed when other wear testing configurations had been used. Thus, under the conditions imposed, CrN/CrCN/DLC coating is the best option when high contact pressure is applied to the coated surfaces.