Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Coleman, John

  • Google
  • 2
  • 13
  • 34

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2020Sensitivity of Thermal Predictions to Uncertain Surface Tension Data in Laser Additive Manufacturing31citations
  • 2019Uncertainty Propagation Through a Simulation of Industrial High Pressure Die Casting3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Heigel, J.
1 / 1 shared
Ricker, R. E.
1 / 1 shared
Levine, L.
1 / 1 shared
Raghavan, N.
1 / 2 shared
Babu, S. S.
1 / 12 shared
Plotkowski, A.
1 / 2 shared
Stump, B.
1 / 3 shared
Sabau, A. S.
1 / 1 shared
Krane, M. J. M.
1 / 2 shared
Fu, Jiahong
1 / 1 shared
Poole, Gregory
1 / 1 shared
Krane, Matthew John M.
1 / 1 shared
Marconnet, Amy
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Heigel, J.
  • Ricker, R. E.
  • Levine, L.
  • Raghavan, N.
  • Babu, S. S.
  • Plotkowski, A.
  • Stump, B.
  • Sabau, A. S.
  • Krane, M. J. M.
  • Fu, Jiahong
  • Poole, Gregory
  • Krane, Matthew John M.
  • Marconnet, Amy
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Sensitivity of Thermal Predictions to Uncertain Surface Tension Data in Laser Additive Manufacturing

  • Heigel, J.
  • Ricker, R. E.
  • Levine, L.
  • Coleman, John
  • Raghavan, N.
  • Babu, S. S.
  • Plotkowski, A.
  • Stump, B.
  • Sabau, A. S.
  • Krane, M. J. M.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To understand the process-microstructure relationships in additive manufacturing (AM), it is necessary to predict the solidification characteristics in the melt pool. This study investigates the influence of Marangoni driven fluid flow on the predicted melt pool geometry and solidification conditions using a continuum finite volume model. A calibrated laser absorptivity was determined by comparing the model predictions (neglecting fluid flow) against melt pool dimensions obtained from single laser melt experiments on a nickel super alloy 625 (IN625) plate. Using this calibrated efficiency, predicted melt pool geometries agree well with experiments across a range of process conditions. When fluid mechanics is considered, a surface tension gradient recommended for IN625 tends to overpredict the influence of convective heat transfer, but the use of an intermediate value reported from experimental measurements of a similar nickel super alloy produces excellent experimental agreement. Despite its significant effect on the melt pool geometry predictions, fluid flow was found to have a small effect on the predicted solidification conditions compared to processing conditions. This result suggests that under certain circumstances, a model only considering conductive heat transfer is sufficient for approximating process-microstructure relationships in laser AM. Extending the model to multiple laser passes further showed that fluid flow also has a small effect on the solidification conditions compared to the transient variations in the process. Limitations of the current model and areas of improvement, including uncertainties associated with the phenomenological model inputs are discussed.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • nickel
  • experiment
  • melt
  • additive manufacturing
  • solidification