Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Shiratori, Masaki

  • Google
  • 2
  • 8
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2020Benchmark Analyses on the Elastic–Plastic Behavior of Carbon Steel Pipes Under Seismic Load3citations
  • 2002Statistical aspects of brittle fracture in low-alloyed steels2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Watakabe, Tomoyoshi
1 / 1 shared
Otani, Akihito
1 / 2 shared
Nakamura, Izumi
1 / 2 shared
Shibutani, Tadahiro
1 / 1 shared
Morishita, Masaki
1 / 1 shared
Nedbal, Ivan
1 / 1 shared
Strnadel, Bohumír
1 / 6 shared
Prioul, Claude
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Watakabe, Tomoyoshi
  • Otani, Akihito
  • Nakamura, Izumi
  • Shibutani, Tadahiro
  • Morishita, Masaki
  • Nedbal, Ivan
  • Strnadel, Bohumír
  • Prioul, Claude
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Benchmark Analyses on the Elastic–Plastic Behavior of Carbon Steel Pipes Under Seismic Load

  • Watakabe, Tomoyoshi
  • Otani, Akihito
  • Nakamura, Izumi
  • Shiratori, Masaki
  • Shibutani, Tadahiro
  • Morishita, Masaki
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>A series of inelastic benchmark and parametric analyses was conducted on the tests of a pipe elbow and a piping system model made from carbon steel to investigate variabilities of elastic–plastic analysis results and clarify the factors affecting the analytical results. The analysis on the pipe elbow was the inelastic static analysis and the analysis on the piping system model included the inelastic dynamic analysis under the random input motion. From the benchmark analysis results, we found that setting the yield stress in the material property approximation had a significant influence on the inelastic analytical results, while the work hardening modulus in the bilinear approximation of the stress–strain curve had little influence. The parametric analysis was performed with the viewpoint to examine the influence of the yield stress and the work hardening modulus when the material property was approximated as the bilinear relation. The results also showed that the setting of the yield stress had larger impact on the analytical results than the setting of the work hardening modules. The parametric analysis results confirmed that the variation in the analytical results among different analysts would be reduced by using the same material property approximation.</jats:p>

Topics
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • steel
  • random