| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Chen, Haofeng
University of Strathclyde
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2019Creep-fatigue and cyclically enhanced creep mechanisms in aluminium based metal matrix compositescitations
- 2017A novel simulation for the design of a low cycle fatigue experimental testing programmecitations
- 2017Effect of fiber cross section geometry on cyclic plastic behavior of continuous fiber reinforced aluminum matrix compositescitations
- 2016Effect of fiber cross section geometry on cyclic plastic behavior of continuous fiber reinforced aluminum matrix compositescitations
- 2015Verification of the linear matching method for limit and shakedown analysis by comparison with experimentscitations
- 2013Verification of the linear matching method for limit and shakedown analysis by comparison with experiments
- 2013A fully implicit, lower bound, multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluationcitations
- 2012A fully implicit multi-axial solution strategy for direct ratchet boundary evaluation
- 2004Fatigue-creep and plastic collapse of notched barscitations
- 2003Linear matching method for creep rupture assessmentcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Verification of the linear matching method for limit and shakedown analysis by comparison with experiments
Abstract
The Linear Matching Method (LMM), a direct numerical method for determining shakedown and ratchet limits of components, has seen significant development in recent years. Previous verifications of these developments against cyclic nonlinear finite element analysis have shown favourable results, and now this verification process is being extended to include comparisons with experimental results.<br/>This paper presents a comparison of LMM analysis with experimental tests for limit loads and shakedown limits available in the literature. The limit load and shakedown limits were determined for pipe intersections and nozzle-sphere intersections respectively, thus testing the accuracy of the LMM when analysing real plant components. Details of the component geometries, materials andtest procedures used in the experiments are given. Following this a description of the LMM analysis is given which includes a description of how these features have been interpreted for numerical analysis. A comparison of the results shows that the LMM is capable of predicting accurate yet conservative limit loads and shakedown limits.<br/>