Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ansdell, Paul

  • Google
  • 2
  • 10
  • 26

Northumbria University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Contraction intensity modulates spinal excitability during transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked silent period in rectus femoris muscle3citations
  • 2018Motor cortical and corticospinal function differ during an isometric squat compared to isometric knee extension23citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Howatson, Glyn
2 / 2 shared
Walker, Simon
1 / 2 shared
Gomez-Guerrero, Gonzalo
1 / 1 shared
Avela, Janne
1 / 1 shared
Thomas, Kevin
1 / 3 shared
Kidgell, Dawson
1 / 1 shared
Frazer, Ashlyn
1 / 1 shared
Škarabot, Jakob
1 / 1 shared
Brownstein, Callum
1 / 1 shared
Goodall, Stuart
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Howatson, Glyn
  • Walker, Simon
  • Gomez-Guerrero, Gonzalo
  • Avela, Janne
  • Thomas, Kevin
  • Kidgell, Dawson
  • Frazer, Ashlyn
  • Škarabot, Jakob
  • Brownstein, Callum
  • Goodall, Stuart
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Motor cortical and corticospinal function differ during an isometric squat compared to isometric knee extension

  • Howatson, Glyn
  • Thomas, Kevin
  • Ansdell, Paul
  • Kidgell, Dawson
  • Frazer, Ashlyn
  • Škarabot, Jakob
  • Brownstein, Callum
  • Goodall, Stuart
Abstract

It has been suggested that task-specific changes in neurophysiological function (neuroplasticity), should be assessed using testing modalities that replicate the characteristics of the intervention. The squat is a commonly prescribed resistance exercise that has been shown to elicit changes in central nervous system (CNS) function. However, previous studies have assessed squat-induced neuroplasticity using isometric knee extension, potentially confounding the results. The present study aimed to assess the agreement between corticospinal and intracortical activity relating to the knee extensors during isometric knee extension compared to an isometric squat task. Eleven males completed a neurophysiological assessment in an isometric squat (IS), and knee extension (KE) task matched for joint-angles (hip, knee, and ankle). Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were delivered during isometric contractions at a range of intensities to assess short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) and corticospinal excitability. Group mean values for SICI (70 ± 14% vs. 63 ± 12% of unconditioned MEP during IS and KE, respectively) and corticospinal excitability (mean differences 2-5% of Mmax at 25, 50, 75 and 100% MVC between the IS and KE) were not different between the two tasks (P > 0.05) in the vastus lateralis (VL). However, limits of agreement were wide, with poor-to-moderate average ICCs (SICI: ICC3,1= 0.15, corticospinal excitability: average ICC3,1 range = 0.0-0.63), indicating disparate corticospinal and intracortical activity between the IS and KE. These data highlight the importance of task-specificity when assessing the modulation of corticospinal excitability and SICI in response to interventions resulting in neuroplastic changes.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • hot isostatic pressing