Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Haber, Richard A.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 11
  • 12

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Binder removal from ceramic stereolithography green bodies: A neutron imaging and thermal analysis study8citations
  • 2023The effects of carbonaceous inclusions and their distributions on dynamic failure processes in boron carbide ceramics4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jacobson, David L.
1 / 1 shared
Mcaleer, Eoin
1 / 1 shared
Akdogan, Enver Koray
1 / 1 shared
Alazzawi, Mustafa K.
1 / 1 shared
Hwang, Chawon
1 / 1 shared
Lamanna, Jacob M.
1 / 1 shared
Shaeffer, Matthew
1 / 1 shared
Yang, Qirong
1 / 2 shared
Malhotra, Pinkesh
1 / 1 shared
Ramesh, K. T.
1 / 5 shared
Du, Jun
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jacobson, David L.
  • Mcaleer, Eoin
  • Akdogan, Enver Koray
  • Alazzawi, Mustafa K.
  • Hwang, Chawon
  • Lamanna, Jacob M.
  • Shaeffer, Matthew
  • Yang, Qirong
  • Malhotra, Pinkesh
  • Ramesh, K. T.
  • Du, Jun
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Binder removal from ceramic stereolithography green bodies: A neutron imaging and thermal analysis study

  • Haber, Richard A.
  • Jacobson, David L.
  • Mcaleer, Eoin
  • Akdogan, Enver Koray
  • Alazzawi, Mustafa K.
  • Hwang, Chawon
  • Lamanna, Jacob M.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Stereolithography of ceramics remains one of the most powerful additive manufacturing routes for the creation of intricate ceramic parts. Despite its utility as a forming tool, ceramic stereolithography requires a challenging debinding stage due to the requisite high polymeric loading. Earlier research has identified both the polymeric resin composition and debinding atmosphere to be crucial factors in improving debinding performance. Here, we use a combination of thermogravimetric analysis and neutron imaging to examine samples of different compositions printed using the same processing and exposure parameters. We quantify the influence of both polyethylene glycol addition and the use of different debinding atmospheres (argon and vacuum) on the debinding behavior of ceramic pellets. Specifically, we demonstrate a method for examining the concentration gradients that develop during thermal debinding with the aid of neutron tomography. We find that at a constant heating rate of 1°C/min up to 500°C, vacuum atmosphere appears to result in a greater number of cracks as compared to the use of argon. The vacuum atmosphere led to the development of lower concentration gradients in the samples on average. The greatest improvement resulted with the addition of polyethylene glycol to the samples. This addition led to significantly less cracking and much lower concentration gradients in samples during debinding. These results prompt us to conclude that while keeping printing and exposure parameters constant, composition modification has a more significant effect on the debinding improvement than heating atmosphere.</jats:p>

Topics
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • crack
  • thermogravimetry
  • forming
  • ceramic
  • resin
  • additive manufacturing
  • Neutron tomography