Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Davis, Peter

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2010Flexural strength of glass fibre-reinforced posts bonded to dual-cure composite resin cements13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mannocci, Francesco
1 / 12 shared
Sherriff, Martyn
1 / 5 shared
Pilecki, Peter
1 / 3 shared
Foxton, Richard Mark
1 / 29 shared
Melo, Luciana S. D.
1 / 1 shared
Watson, Timothy F.
1 / 17 shared
Chart of publication period
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mannocci, Francesco
  • Sherriff, Martyn
  • Pilecki, Peter
  • Foxton, Richard Mark
  • Melo, Luciana S. D.
  • Watson, Timothy F.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Flexural strength of glass fibre-reinforced posts bonded to dual-cure composite resin cements

  • Mannocci, Francesco
  • Sherriff, Martyn
  • Pilecki, Peter
  • Foxton, Richard Mark
  • Melo, Luciana S. D.
  • Watson, Timothy F.
  • Davis, Peter
Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the flexural strength of two different types of glass fibre-reinforced posts bonded to dual-cure composite resin cements. Forty glass methacrylate-based fibre posts (GC Fiber Post) and 20 glass fibre inter-polymerizing network posts (everStick POST) were divided into three groups. Group 1 contained 20 GC posts that were bonded to a dual-cure composite cement (UnifilCore). Group 2 contained 20 Stick Tech posts that had adhesive applied (Scotchbond Multipurpose resin) and were bonded to a dual-cure composite resin cement (RelyX Unicem). Group 3 contained 20 GC posts that were pretreated with a silane-coupling agent before being treated with resin and composite, as in group 1. A 4-point bend test was carried out to failure on all of the groups. Failure modes were determined using scanning electron microscopy. Pretreatment of the post surface with the silane-coupling agent did not increase the flexural strength. The flexural strength of the Stick Tech post was significantly lower than the flexural strength of the GC post. The mode of failure for the GC Posts was adhesive, whereas the Stick Tech posts failed cohesively. Different flexural strengths and failure modes were observed among the two fibre post-resin systems.

Topics
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • composite
  • cement
  • flexural strength
  • resin
  • gas chromatography