Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Maidin, S.

  • Google
  • 3
  • 10
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2015BONE SCAFFOLD GEOMETRICAL DESIGN AND MATERIAL SELECTION BY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS1citations
  • 2015Analysis of Applying Ultrasonic Frequency on a Desktop FDM Nozzlecitations
  • 2014Analysis of Applying Ultrasonic Frequency on a Desktop FDM Nozzlecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yahaya, Saifudin Hafiz
1 / 1 shared
Loo, H. S.
1 / 1 shared
F., Samat K.
1 / 1 shared
Alkahari, M. R.
1 / 1 shared
Pei, E.
1 / 2 shared
Muhamad, Mk
1 / 1 shared
Aziz, Kfa
1 / 1 shared
Abdul Aziz, K. F.
1 / 1 shared
Pei, Eujin
1 / 2 shared
Muhamad, M. K.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2015
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yahaya, Saifudin Hafiz
  • Loo, H. S.
  • F., Samat K.
  • Alkahari, M. R.
  • Pei, E.
  • Muhamad, Mk
  • Aziz, Kfa
  • Abdul Aziz, K. F.
  • Pei, Eujin
  • Muhamad, M. K.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

BONE SCAFFOLD GEOMETRICAL DESIGN AND MATERIAL SELECTION BY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS

  • Maidin, S.
  • Yahaya, Saifudin Hafiz
  • Loo, H. S.
  • F., Samat K.
  • Alkahari, M. R.
Abstract

Bone scaffold is used to aid the regenerative of human organ tissues that caused by a bone fracture. Bone fracture is normally caused by the exertion of exceeding force to the bone that could not be borne or due to bone disease such as osteoporosis. Hence, the use of bone scaffold is needed to provide comfort to a patient and to slowly replace the metal plate for bone implants. Since there is demand in the market for an effective bone scaffold design, the objective of this research is to study the application of Additive Manufacturing (AM) and bone scaffold design in medical application as well as to compare the effectiveness of several materials for its application. Four design of bone scaffolds had been proposed and simulated for compression test and torsional test. A CAD software was used to design bone geometrical structure. In order to select the best bone scaffold design, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used as the method to assist in the selection process. Based on the comparative analysis of different design, it was found that Design 1 was the best design. This was mainly due to its geometrical feature that permits higher strength compared to the other geometrical structure of the design. Furthermore, this research compares three different types of materials, namely Alumina Bio-ceramic, Bio-active Glasses and Calcium Phosphate Bio-ceramic. The comparative analysis showed that the best material was Alumina Bio-ceramic. This material has the highest strength compared to other materials due to its capability to sustain the force exerted on it and hence fulfil the priority setting of choosing the material with the highest strength as the main criteria. However, this material is the most expensive material compared to other two materials.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • compression test
  • ceramic
  • Calcium
  • additive manufacturing
  • collision-induced dissociation