People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Jensen, Jørgen Arendt
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (26/26 displayed)
- 2023Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging using capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducerscitations
- 2022A Hand-Held 190+190 Row–Column Addressed CMUT Probe for Volumetric Imagingcitations
- 20213D printed calibration micro-phantoms for super-resolution ultrasound imaging validationcitations
- 2020Real Time Synthetic Aperture and Plane Wave Ultrasound Imaging with the Xilinx VERSAL™ SIMD-VLIW Architecturecitations
- 2019Imaging Performance for Two Row–Column Arrayscitations
- 2019188+188 Row–Column Addressed CMUT Transducer for Super Resolution Imagingcitations
- 2019CMUT Electrode Resistance Design: Modelling and Experimental Verification by a Row-Column Arraycitations
- 20193D Printed Calibration Micro-phantoms for Validation of Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imagingcitations
- 2018Probe development of CMUT and PZT row-column-addressed 2-D arrayscitations
- 2018Increasing the field-of-view of row–column-addressed ultrasound transducers: implementation of a diverging compound lenscitations
- 2018Design of a novel zig-zag 192+192 Row Column Addressed Array Transducer: A simulation study.citations
- 2017Transmitting Performance Evaluation of ASICs for CMUT-Based Portable Ultrasound Scanners
- 2017Real-time Implementation of Synthetic Aperture Vector Flow Imaging on a Consumer-level Tabletcitations
- 2017Output Pressure and Pulse-Echo Characteristics of CMUTs as Function of Plate Dimensionscitations
- 20163-D Vector Flow Using a Row-Column Addressed CMUT Arraycitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row–Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization. Part I: Apodization Design and Line Element Beamformingcitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row–Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization. Part I: Apodization Design and Line Element Beamformingcitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row-Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization:Part II: Transducer Fabrication and Experimental Resultscitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row-Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodizationcitations
- 2012Multilayer piezoelectric transducer models combined with Field IIcitations
- 2011Performance Evaluation of a Synthetic Aperture Real-Time Ultrasound System
- 2010Simulation of High Quality Ultrasound Imaging
- 2009Parameter sensitivity study of a Field II multilayer transducer model on a convex transducercitations
- 2007Medical ultrasound imagingcitations
- 2004Preliminary In-Vivo Evaluation of Convex Array Synthetic Aperture Imagingcitations
- 2003Delay generation methods with reduced memory requirementscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Transmitting Performance Evaluation of ASICs for CMUT-Based Portable Ultrasound Scanners
Abstract
Portable ultrasound scanners (PUS) have, in recent years, raised a lot of attention, as they can potentially overcome some of the limitations of static scanners. However, PUS have a lot of design limitations including size and power consumption. These restrictions can compromise the image quality of the scanner. In order to overcome these restrictions, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) are needed to implement the electronics. In this work, a comparative study of the transmitting performance of a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) driven by a commercial generic ultrasound transmitter and an ASIC optimized for CMUT-based PUS is presented. A single CMUT element is pulsed with a 1% dutycycle at a frequency of 5 MHz. The DC bias voltage is 80 V and the pulsing voltage is 20 V. The acoustic performance is assessed by comparing the ultrasonic signals measured with a hydrophone both in the time and frequency domains. The difference in normalized signal amplitude evaluated at the center frequency of the CMUT is −1.9 dB and the measured bandwidth is equivalent. The ASIC consumes only 1.3% of the total power consumption used by the commercial transmitter.