Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala

  • Google
  • 11
  • 47
  • 61

University of Strathclyde

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 20243-Dimensional residual neural architecture search for ultrasonic defect detection5citations
  • 2023In-process non-destructive evaluation of metal additive manufactured components at build using ultrasound and eddy-current approaches11citations
  • 2023Mapping SEARCH capabilities to Spirit AeroSystems NDE and automation demand for compositescitations
  • 2022Mechanical stress measurement using phased array ultrasonic systemcitations
  • 2022Multi-sensor electromagnetic inspection feasibility for aerospace composites surface defectscitations
  • 2022Investigating ultrasound wave propagation through the coupling medium and non-flat surface of wire + arc additive manufactured components inspected by a PAUT roller-probecitations
  • 2022Automated multi-modal in-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacturingcitations
  • 2022In-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacture components using ultrasound high-temperature dry-coupled roller-probecitations
  • 2022Collaborative robotic Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluation16citations
  • 2020In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding29citations
  • 2020Laser-assisted surface adaptive ultrasound (SAUL) inspection of samples with complex surface profiles using a phased array roller-probecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tunukovic, Vedran
2 / 6 shared
Mackinnon, Christopher
1 / 3 shared
Ohare, Tom
1 / 5 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
11 / 22 shared
Mcknight, Shaun
1 / 7 shared
Macleod, Charles N.
10 / 45 shared
Pierce, Stephen
10 / 51 shared
Halavage, Steven
4 / 6 shared
Loukas, Charalampos
5 / 13 shared
Ding, Jialuo
5 / 39 shared
Williams, Stewart
5 / 39 shared
Rizwan, Muhammad Khalid
3 / 4 shared
Misael, Pimentel Espirindio E. Silva
4 / 5 shared
Mckegney, Scott
4 / 6 shared
Lines, David
7 / 18 shared
Foster, Euan A.
1 / 2 shared
Zimermann, Rastislav
7 / 9 shared
Fitzpatrick, Stephen
4 / 14 shared
Vasilev, Momchil
6 / 17 shared
Dobie, Gordon
2 / 21 shared
Poole, A.
1 / 2 shared
Obrien-Oreilly, J.
2 / 3 shared
Pyle, Richard
1 / 2 shared
Munro, G.
2 / 3 shared
Ohare, T.
2 / 3 shared
Mcinnes, M.
2 / 2 shared
Hifi, A.
1 / 1 shared
Mcknight, S.
2 / 3 shared
Gomez, R.
1 / 3 shared
Shields, M.
1 / 1 shared
Hutchison, Alistair
1 / 1 shared
Mehnen, Jorn
1 / 4 shared
Lotfian, Saeid
1 / 22 shared
Gachagan, Anthony
5 / 76 shared
Javadi, Yashar
4 / 31 shared
Foster, E.
1 / 2 shared
Burnham, K.
1 / 1 shared
Gover, H.
1 / 1 shared
Paton, S.
1 / 1 shared
Grosser, M.
1 / 2 shared
Foster, Euan
2 / 8 shared
Macdonald, Charles
1 / 1 shared
Pierce, Stephen Gareth
1 / 3 shared
Stratoudaki, Theodosia
1 / 7 shared
Mineo, Carmelo
1 / 15 shared
Qiu, Zhen
2 / 14 shared
Sweeney, Nina E.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tunukovic, Vedran
  • Mackinnon, Christopher
  • Ohare, Tom
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Mcknight, Shaun
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
  • Halavage, Steven
  • Loukas, Charalampos
  • Ding, Jialuo
  • Williams, Stewart
  • Rizwan, Muhammad Khalid
  • Misael, Pimentel Espirindio E. Silva
  • Mckegney, Scott
  • Lines, David
  • Foster, Euan A.
  • Zimermann, Rastislav
  • Fitzpatrick, Stephen
  • Vasilev, Momchil
  • Dobie, Gordon
  • Poole, A.
  • Obrien-Oreilly, J.
  • Pyle, Richard
  • Munro, G.
  • Ohare, T.
  • Mcinnes, M.
  • Hifi, A.
  • Mcknight, S.
  • Gomez, R.
  • Shields, M.
  • Hutchison, Alistair
  • Mehnen, Jorn
  • Lotfian, Saeid
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Javadi, Yashar
  • Foster, E.
  • Burnham, K.
  • Gover, H.
  • Paton, S.
  • Grosser, M.
  • Foster, Euan
  • Macdonald, Charles
  • Pierce, Stephen Gareth
  • Stratoudaki, Theodosia
  • Mineo, Carmelo
  • Qiu, Zhen
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

3-Dimensional residual neural architecture search for ultrasonic defect detection

  • Tunukovic, Vedran
  • Mackinnon, Christopher
  • Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
  • Ohare, Tom
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Mcknight, Shaun
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
Abstract

This study presents a deep learning methodology using 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural networks to detect defects in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites through volumetric ultrasonic testing data. Acquiring large amounts of ultrasonic training data experimentally is expensive and time-consuming. To address this issue, a synthetic data generation method was extended to incorporate volumetric data. By preserving the complete volumetric data, complex preprocessing is reduced, and the model can utilize spatial and temporal information that is lost during imaging. This enables the model to utilize important features that might be overlooked otherwise.<br/><br/>The performance of three architectures were compared. The first architecture is prevalent in the literature for the classification of volumetric datasets. The second demonstrated a hand-designed approach to architecture design, with modifications to the first architecture to address the challenges of this specific task. A key modification was the use of cuboidal kernels to account for the large aspect ratios seen in ultrasonic data. The third architecture was discovered through neural architecture search from a modified 3D Residual Neural Network (ResNet) search space. Additionally, domain-specific augmentation methods were incorporated during training, resulting in significant improvements in model performance, with a mean accuracy improvement of 22.4% on the discovered architecture. The discovered architecture demonstrated the best performance with a mean accuracy increase of 7.9% over the second best model. It was able to consistently detect all defects whilst maintaining a model size smaller than most 2-dimensional (2D) ResNets. Each model had an inference time of less than 0.5 seconds, making them efficient for the interpretation of large amounts of data.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • composite
  • defect
  • ultrasonic