People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Jensen, Jørgen Arendt
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (26/26 displayed)
- 2023Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging using capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducerscitations
- 2022A Hand-Held 190+190 Row–Column Addressed CMUT Probe for Volumetric Imagingcitations
- 20213D printed calibration micro-phantoms for super-resolution ultrasound imaging validationcitations
- 2020Real Time Synthetic Aperture and Plane Wave Ultrasound Imaging with the Xilinx VERSAL™ SIMD-VLIW Architecturecitations
- 2019Imaging Performance for Two Row–Column Arrayscitations
- 2019188+188 Row–Column Addressed CMUT Transducer for Super Resolution Imagingcitations
- 2019CMUT Electrode Resistance Design: Modelling and Experimental Verification by a Row-Column Arraycitations
- 20193D Printed Calibration Micro-phantoms for Validation of Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imagingcitations
- 2018Probe development of CMUT and PZT row-column-addressed 2-D arrayscitations
- 2018Increasing the field-of-view of row–column-addressed ultrasound transducers: implementation of a diverging compound lenscitations
- 2018Design of a novel zig-zag 192+192 Row Column Addressed Array Transducer: A simulation study.citations
- 2017Transmitting Performance Evaluation of ASICs for CMUT-Based Portable Ultrasound Scanners
- 2017Real-time Implementation of Synthetic Aperture Vector Flow Imaging on a Consumer-level Tabletcitations
- 2017Output Pressure and Pulse-Echo Characteristics of CMUTs as Function of Plate Dimensionscitations
- 20163-D Vector Flow Using a Row-Column Addressed CMUT Arraycitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row–Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization. Part I: Apodization Design and Line Element Beamformingcitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row–Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization. Part I: Apodization Design and Line Element Beamformingcitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row-Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization:Part II: Transducer Fabrication and Experimental Resultscitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row-Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodizationcitations
- 2012Multilayer piezoelectric transducer models combined with Field IIcitations
- 2011Performance Evaluation of a Synthetic Aperture Real-Time Ultrasound System
- 2010Simulation of High Quality Ultrasound Imaging
- 2009Parameter sensitivity study of a Field II multilayer transducer model on a convex transducercitations
- 2007Medical ultrasound imagingcitations
- 2004Preliminary In-Vivo Evaluation of Convex Array Synthetic Aperture Imagingcitations
- 2003Delay generation methods with reduced memory requirementscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
3-D Imaging Using Row-Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the fabrication, characterization, and experimental imaging results of a 62+62 element λ/2-pitch row-column-addressed capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) array with integrated apodization. A new fabrication process was used to manufacture a 26.3 mm by 26.3 mm array using five lithography steps. The array includes an integrated apodization, presented in detail in Part I of this paper, which is designed to reduce the amplitude of the ghost echoes that are otherwise prominent for row-column-addressed arrays. Custom front-end electronics were produced with the capability of transmitting and receiving on all elements, and the option of disabling the integrated apodization. The center frequency and -6-dB fractional bandwidth of the array elements were 2.77 ± 0.26 MHz and 102 ± 10%, respectively. The surface transmit pressure at 2.5 MHz was 590 ± 73 kPa, and the sensitivity was 0.299 ± 0.090 V/Pa. The nearest neighbor crosstalk level was -23.9 ± 3.7 dB, while the transmit-to-receive-elements crosstalk level was -40.2 ± 3.5 dB. Imaging of a 0.3-mm-diameter steel wire using synthetic transmit focusing with 62 single-element emissions demonstrated axial and lateral FWHMs of 0.71 mm and 1.79 mm (f-number: 1.4), respectively, compared with simulated axial and lateral FWHMs of 0.69 mm and 1.76 mm. The dominant ghost echo was reduced by 15.8 dB in measurements using the integrated apodization compared with the disabled configuration. The effect was reproduced in simulations, showing a ghost echo reduction of 18.9 dB.