People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Khuri-Yakub, Butrus T.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (13/13 displayed)
- 2013Integrated Circuits for Volumetric Ultrasound Imaging With 2-D CMUT Arrayscitations
- 2013A Comparison Between Conventional and Collapse-Mode Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers in 10-MHz 1-D Arrayscitations
- 2012Volumetric Real-Time Imaging Using a CMUT Ring Arraycitations
- 2012Deep Tissue Photoacoustic Imaging Using a Miniaturized 2-D Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Arraycitations
- 2011Chemical Vapor Detection Using a Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducercitations
- 20103-D Deep Penetration Photoacoustic Imaging with a 2-D CMUT Array.
- 2009Three-Dimensional Photoacoustic Imaging Using a Two-Dimensional CMUT Arraycitations
- 2009An Integrated Circuit With Transmit Beamforming Flip-Chip Bonded to a 2-D CMUT Array for 3-D Ultrasound Imagingcitations
- 2009Wafer-Bonded 2-D CMUT Arrays Incorporating Through-Wafer Trench-Isolated Interconnects with a Supporting Framecitations
- 2008Integration of 2D CMUT arrays with front-end electronics for volumetric ultrasound imagingcitations
- 2007Integration of trench-isolated through-wafer interconnects with 2d capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer arrayscitations
- 2007Finite element modeling and experimental characterization of crosstalk in 1-D CMUT arrayscitations
- 20063-D ultrasound imaging using a forward-looking CMUT ring array for intravascular/intracardiac applications
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
A Comparison Between Conventional and Collapse-Mode Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers in 10-MHz 1-D Arrays
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between a collapse-mode and a conventional-mode capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT); both devices have a 1-μm-thick silicon plate and operate at 10 MHz when biased at 100 V. The radii of the circular plates and the gap heights are modified to meet the design specifications required for a fair comparison. Finite element analysis (FEA) shows that the collapse-mode CMUT has higher output pressure sensitivity (46.5 kPa/V) than the conventional CMUT (13.1 kPa/V), and achieves a 3-dB fractional bandwidth (FBW) of 124% compared with 128% for the conventional mode. These results were validated by experiments performed on devices fabricated in a 1-D phased array configuration using the local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS)/wafer-bonding process. The measured output pressure sensitivity and the FBW of the collapse-mode and the conventional CMUTs at 100 V were 26.4 kPa/V and 103% and 12.7 kPa/V and 111%, respectively. The maximum output pressure of the collapse-mode CMUT was 1.19 MPa at 10 MHz, which was much higher than the conventional CMUT (0.44 MPa). However, the second harmonic distortion (SHD) level of the collapse-mode CMUT is higher than the conventional CMUT at the same excitation condition. Even with higher electric field in the cavity, the collapse-mode CMUT was as stable as the conventional CMUT in a long-term test. A 30-h test with a total of 3.2 × 10(9) cycles of 30 V ac excitation resulted in no significant degradation in the performance of the collapse-mode devices.