Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Pessemier, Toon De

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 44

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Energy-and Labor-Aware Production Scheduling for Industrial Demand Response Using Adaptive Multiobjective Memetic Algorithm44citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Liu, Ying
1 / 6 shared
Joseph, Wout
1 / 4 shared
Lohse, Niels
1 / 1 shared
Martens, Luc
1 / 4 shared
Gong, Xu
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Liu, Ying
  • Joseph, Wout
  • Lohse, Niels
  • Martens, Luc
  • Gong, Xu
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Energy-and Labor-Aware Production Scheduling for Industrial Demand Response Using Adaptive Multiobjective Memetic Algorithm

  • Liu, Ying
  • Joseph, Wout
  • Pessemier, Toon De
  • Lohse, Niels
  • Martens, Luc
  • Gong, Xu
Abstract

<p>Price-based demand response stimulates factories to adapt their power consumption patterns to time-sensitive electricity prices, so that a rise in energy cost is prevented without affecting production on the shop floor. This paper introduces a multiobjective optimization (MOO) model that jointly schedules job processing, machine idle modes, and human workers under real-time electricity pricing. Beyond existing models, labor is considered due to a common tradeoff between energy cost and labor cost. An adaptive multiobjective memetic algorithm (AMOMA) is proposed to fast converge toward the Pareto front without loss in diversity. It leverages feedback of cross-dominance and stagnation in a search and a prioritized grouping strategy. In this way, adaptive balance remains between exploration of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II and exploitation of two mutually complementary local search operators. A case study of an extrusion blow molding process in a plastic bottle manufacturer and benchmarks demonstrate the MOO effectiveness and efficiency of AMOMA. The impacts of production-prohibited periods and relative portion of energy and labor costs on MOO are further analyzed, respectively. The generalization of this method was further demonstrated in a multimachine experiment. The common tradeoff relations between the energy and labor costs as well as between the makespan and the sum of the two cost parts were quantitatively revealed.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • extrusion