People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Tukiainen, Antti
Tampere University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (23/23 displayed)
- 2024Bridging the gap between surface physics and photonicscitations
- 2024Ti3+ Self-Doping-Mediated Optimization of TiO2 Photocatalyst Coating Grown by Atomic Layer Depositioncitations
- 2022Insights into Tailoring of Atomic Layer Deposition Grown TiO2 as Photoelectrode Coating
- 2022Luminescent (Er,Ho)2O3 thin films by ALD to enhance the performance of silicon solar cellscitations
- 2022Low-Temperature Route to Direct Amorphous to Rutile Crystallization of TiO2Thin Films Grown by Atomic Layer Depositioncitations
- 2022Tunable Ti3+-Mediated Charge Carrier Dynamics of Atomic Layer Deposition-Grown Amorphous TiO2citations
- 2021Comparison of the heat-treatment effect on carrier dynamics in TiO2 thin films deposited by different methodscitations
- 2021Luminescent (Er,Ho)2O3 thin films by ALD to enhance the performance of silicon solar cellscitations
- 2021Interface Engineering of TiO2 Photoelectrode Coatings Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition on Siliconcitations
- 2020Optimization of photogenerated charge carrier lifetimes in ald grown tio2 for photonic applicationscitations
- 2019Thermophotonic cooling in GaAs based light emitterscitations
- 2019Highly efficient charge separation in model Z-scheme TiO2/TiSi2/Si photoanode by micropatterned titanium silicide interlayercitations
- 2019Observation of local electroluminescent cooling and identifying the remaining challenges
- 2018Surface doping of GaxIn1−xAs semiconductor crystals with magnesiumcitations
- 2017Structured metal/polymer back reflectors for III-V solar cells
- 2016High-efficiency GaInP/GaAs/GaInNAs solar cells grown by combined MBE-MOCVD techniquecitations
- 2016Determination of composition and energy gaps of GaInNAsSb layers grown by MBEcitations
- 2016Optical Energy Transfer and Loss Mechanisms in Coupled Intracavity Light Emitterscitations
- 2016Combined MBE-MOCVD process for high-efficiency multijunction solar cells
- 2016High efficiency multijunction solar cells: Electrical and optical properties of the dilute nitride sub-junctions
- 2015Defects in dilute nitride solar cells
- 2015Dilute nitrides for boosting the efficiency of III-V multijunction solar cells
- 2004Effects of rapid thermal annealing on deep levels in n -GaInPcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Optical Energy Transfer and Loss Mechanisms in Coupled Intracavity Light Emitters
Abstract
Despite the near-unity internal quantum efficiencies (IQEs) demonstrated for GaAs-based light emitters, laser cooling of the ubiquitous III-V semiconductors has not been feasible. The key challenges for III-V optical cooling are the reduced absorption of optical excitation at photon energies well below the bandgap and the strong confinement of light in the high refractive index semiconductors. Here, we investigate the possibility to eliminate the need for light extraction and to eventually relax the requirements of the IQE. This is done using electroluminescence and optical energy transfer within intracavity devices consisting of an AlGaAs/GaAs double heterojunction light emitting diodes and a GaAs p-n-homojunction photodiode enclosed within a single semiconductor cavity. We measure the intracavity energy transfer, i.e., the coupling quantum efficiency (CQE) between the two diodes and estimate loss mechanisms by simultaneously measuring the IV characteristics of the emitter diode and the photocurrent of the absorber diode. The measured CQE of our devices is below 60% due to the mirror, light extraction, nonradiative, and detection losses. While this is far below the state-of-the-art efficiencies, our results suggest that it will be possible to substantially improve the efficiency by adopting the fabrication and design principles used for the best performing photoluminescent emitters.