People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Lesselier, Dominique
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (22/22 displayed)
- 2024Identification and characterization of damaged fiber-reinforced laminates in a Bayesian frameworkcitations
- 2024GPR for Tree Roots Reconstruction under Heterogeneous Soil Conditions
- 2023Identification and characterization of damaged fiber-reinforced laminates in a Bayesian framework
- 2022Data fusion and non-destructive testing of damaged fiber-reinforced laminates
- 2021Ultrasonic array imaging of nuclear austenitic V-shape welds with Inhomogeneous and unknown anisotropic propertiescitations
- 2021A wavelet-based contrast source inversion methodcitations
- 2019Adaptive TFM imaging in anisotropic steels using optimization algorithms coupled to a surrogate model
- 2019Fast 3D model dedicated to thermographic inspections of planar composite structures
- 2016On recent advances and issues ahead in modeling and electromagnetic imaging of perturbed composite laminates
- 2016A new optimization method for solving electromagnetic inverse scattering problems
- 2015MUSIC imaging method for low-high frequency inspection of composite multi-layerscitations
- 2015Subspace-based optimization method for reconstructing 3-D scatterers in anisotropic laminates
- 2015Impedance of an induction coil accounting for the end-effect in eddy current inspection of steam generator tubes
- 2015Electromagnetic MUSIC imaging and 3-D retrieval of defects in anisotropic, multi-layered composite materials
- 2014MUSIC imaging method for low-high frequency inspection of composite multi-layerscitations
- 2014Fast calculation of electromagnetic scattering in anisotropic multilayers and its inverse problem
- 2014Low-high frequency inspection of composite multi-layers and MUSIC-type electromagnetic imaging
- 2012Eddy current modeling of narrow cracks in planar-layered metal structurescitations
- 2008New discretisation scheme based on splines for volume integral method: Application to eddy current testing of tubescitations
- 2008Hybridization of volumetric and surface models for the computation of the T/R EC probe response due to a thin opening flawcitations
- 2008Multi-static response of spherical scatterers and the back-propagation of singular fieldscitations
- 2007Volumetric and surface flaw models for the computation of the EC T/R probe signal due to a thin opening flaw
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
conferencepaper
A new optimization method for solving electromagnetic inverse scattering problems
Abstract
We propose a new optimization scheme for solving electromagnetic inverse scattering problems. As known, they mean to retrieve the physical properties of hidden targets, i.e., the permittivity and/or permeability, from the measured scattering data excited by several incidences. By considering only the physical properties of the targets as unknowns, one usually resorts to the more traditional optimization searching scheme to find the solution, by which one needs to solve the corresponding forward problems for all the incidences at each iteration of the optimization, such as the well-known distorted Born iterative method (DBIM). This is often time-consuming even given the fast forward solvers. Later, a different optimization scheme, the modified gradient method, was proposed, where not only the physical properties of the targets are considered as unknowns but also the electric fields, which are simultaneously updated at each iteration of the optimization. From such a pioneering work, the same authors proposed the well-known contrast source inversion (CSI), considering the unknown to be the induced contrast sources instead of fields in order to form a new type of formulation. Compared to the original modified gradient method, the CSI method uses alternative optimization scheme so as to reduce the complexity of the nonlinear calculations. Considering the electric fields or the induced current as unknowns together with the permittivity/permeability, the inversion solver does not need to repetitively solve the forward problems as in the traditional inversion solvers mentioned above. In this talk, we further stretch the idea in the CSI to consider only the contrast sources as the unknowns by introducing a new type of formulations. While also avoiding to solve the forward problems at each iteration, the merits of doing so is to obtain different optimization paths in every inversion, each of which is di®erent from the one by the CSI method. Having such a new optimization scheme, one is able to justify the obtained reconstructed results by comparing them to each other and to the one obtained by the original CSI.