Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dorier, Matthieu

  • Google
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2020Pufferscale: Rescaling HPC Data Services for High Energy Physics Applications5citations
  • 2020How fast can one resize a distributed file system?1citations
  • 2018Pufferbench: Evaluating and Optimizing Malleability of Distributed Storage3citations
  • 2018A Lower Bound for the Commission Times in Replication-Based Distributed Storage Systemscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ross, Robert
1 / 2 shared
Wild, Stefan M.
1 / 1 shared
Leyffer, Sven
1 / 1 shared
Antoniu, Gabriel
4 / 5 shared
Cheriere, Nathanaël
2 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ross, Robert
  • Wild, Stefan M.
  • Leyffer, Sven
  • Antoniu, Gabriel
  • Cheriere, Nathanaël
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Pufferbench: Evaluating and Optimizing Malleability of Distributed Storage

  • Dorier, Matthieu
  • Antoniu, Gabriel
  • Cheriere, Nathanaël
Abstract

Malleability is the property of an application to be dynamically rescaled at run time. It requires the possibility to dynamically add or remove resources to the infrastructure without interruption. Yet, many Big Data applications cannot benefit from their inherent malleability, since their colocated distributed storage system is not malleable in practice. Commissioning or decommissioning storage nodes is generally assumed to be slow, as such operations have typically been designed for maintenance only. New technologies, however, enable faster data transfers. Still, evaluating the performance of rescaling operations on a given platform is a challenge in itself: no tool currently exists for this purpose. We introduce Pufferbench, a benchmark for evaluating how fast one can scale up and down a distributed storage system on a given infrastructure and, thereby, how viably can one implement storage malleability on it. Besides, it can serve to quickly prototype and evaluate mechanisms for malleability in existing distributed storage systems. We validate Pufferbench against theoretical lower bounds for commission and decommis-sion: it can achieve performance within 16% of them. We use Pufferbench to evaluate in practice these operations in HDFS: commission in HDFS could be accelerated by as much as 14 times! Our results show that: (1) the lower bounds for commission and decommission times we previously established are sound and can be approached in practice; (2) HDFS could handle these operations much more efficiently; most importantly, (3) malleability in distributed storage systems is viable and should be further leveraged for Big Data applications.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy