693.932 PEOPLE
| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Wang, Fengwen
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2021On the competition for ultimately stiff and strong architected materialscitations
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art numerical simulation techniques for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane line defect cavities
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art numerical simulation techniques for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane line defect cavities
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art optical simulation methods for analyzing large nanophotonic structures
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art optical simulation methods for analyzing large nanophotonic structures
- 2018Benchmarking five numerical simulation techniques for computing resonance wavelengths and quality factors in photonic crystal membrane line defect cavitiescitations
- 2018Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?
- 2018Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?
- 2018Investment casting and experimental testing of heat sinks designed by topology optimizationcitations
- 2018Benchmarking five numerical simulation techniques for computing resonance wavelengths and quality factors in photonic crystal membrane line defect cavitiescitations
- 2017Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities
- 2017Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities
- 2017Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavitiescitations
- 2017Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavitiescitations
- 2015Topology Optimized Architectures with Programmable Poisson's Ratio over Large Deformationscitations
- 2014Design of materials with prescribed nonlinear propertiescitations
- 2011Modelling of Active Semiconductor Photonic Crystal Waveguides and Robust Designs based on Topology Optimization
- 2011Modelling of Active Semiconductor Photonic Crystal Waveguides and Robust Designs based on Topology Optimization
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities
Abstract
We benchmark five state-of-the-art computational methods by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analyzing line defect cavities.