Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kaman, Khairell Khazin

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 23

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Performance of coating materials on planar electromagnetic sensing array to detect water contamination23citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Azman, Ahmad Amsyar
1 / 1 shared
Ibrahim, Sallehuddin
1 / 1 shared
Nawawi, Sophan Wahyudi
1 / 1 shared
Yunus, Mohd Amri Md
1 / 1 shared
Azmi, Aizat
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Azman, Ahmad Amsyar
  • Ibrahim, Sallehuddin
  • Nawawi, Sophan Wahyudi
  • Yunus, Mohd Amri Md
  • Azmi, Aizat
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Performance of coating materials on planar electromagnetic sensing array to detect water contamination

  • Azman, Ahmad Amsyar
  • Ibrahim, Sallehuddin
  • Kaman, Khairell Khazin
  • Nawawi, Sophan Wahyudi
  • Yunus, Mohd Amri Md
  • Azmi, Aizat
Abstract

<p>This paper looked into the electrical properties of contaminants via planar electromagnetic sensing array (PESA), which had been coated with various types of coaters, namely, N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone-based membrane and acrylic. Hence, the performance of the coaters had been evaluated based on the minimal difference of estimated results, which was later compared with an Agilent 85070 dielectric probe instrument. Three samples were selected for this paper, namely, nitrate, phosphate, and nickel solutions. These samples were prepared based on varied concentration levels, including 5, 25, 75, and 100 ppm. Besides, the theory for the sensor equivalent to circuit described the calculations to determine the aspects of permittivity and conductivity of the water samples. The results demonstrated that both coaters successfully estimated the electrical properties of the contaminants. The relative permittivity of all samples using the PESA coated with membrane displayed similar trends for the dielectric probe, but a slight variance was present for the PESA coated with acrylic. In fact, the relative permittivity of the nitrate sample ranged from 65 to 78 when the estimation was made using PESA coated with membrane, whereas the acrylic coater demonstrated that the relative permittivity data varied from 0.198 to 41.100. Hence, the acrylic coater failed in precision, thus inappropriate for relative permittivity estimation. Nonetheless, both coaters shared similar pattern for conductivity even with varied concentrations. However, the conductivity increased as the sample concentration increased. As such, this paper concludes that the PESA coated with membrane exhibited better performance compared with acrylic in estimating electrical properties.</p>

Topics
  • nickel
  • theory
  • dielectric constant