People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Barnett, Allen
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (1/1 displayed)
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Design of anodic aluminum oxide rear surface plasmonic heterostructures for light trapping in thin silicon solar cells
Abstract
<p>A metal-dielectric heterostructure that provides the combined capability of light trapping and surface passivation is reported. The light-trapping layer employs a porous aluminum anodic oxide (AAO) with metal nanoparticles formed in the pores on the rear surface of a thin crystalline silicon solar cell. Numerical finite-difference time domain (FDTD) simulations were performed to determine the pore diameter and spacing that would result in optimal light trapping for this metal-dielectric heterostructure. For a 2.5-μm-thick crystalline silicon device, the optimal pore diameter and spacing were determined to be ∼250 and ∼450 nm, respectively. These conditions resulted in an enhancement of the simulated photocurrent by ∼12.6% compared with a device in which the heterostructure was replaced with a homogenous aluminum oxide layer. Simulations also confirmed that the thickness of an underlying dielectric layer should be minimized to 10-20 nm, with the AAO barrier layer being maintained as thin as possible. Finally, it was shown that replacement of silver by aluminum in the pores resulted in a reduction in the photocurrent of 6.3% and would necessitate much larger pore spacing that is difficult to achieve experimentally and would result in thicker AAO barrier layers, which are undesirable.</p>