People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Thomsen, Erik Vilain
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (28/28 displayed)
- 2023Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging using capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducerscitations
- 2022A Hand-Held 190+190 Row–Column Addressed CMUT Probe for Volumetric Imagingcitations
- 2021Polysilicon on Quartz Substrate for Silicide Based Row-Column CMUTs
- 2021Analytical Deflection Profiles and Pull-In Voltage Calculations of Prestressed Electrostatic Actuated MEMS Structurescitations
- 20213D printed calibration micro-phantoms for super-resolution ultrasound imaging validationcitations
- 2020Pull-in Analysis of CMUT Elementscitations
- 2020Large Scale High Voltage 192+192 Row-Column Addressed CMUTs Made with Anodic Bondingcitations
- 2020Electrical Insulation of CMUT Elements Using DREM and Lappingcitations
- 2020Electrical Insulation of CMUT Elements Using DREM and Lappingcitations
- 2019Imaging Performance for Two Row–Column Arrayscitations
- 2019188+188 Row–Column Addressed CMUT Transducer for Super Resolution Imagingcitations
- 2019CMUT Electrode Resistance Design: Modelling and Experimental Verification by a Row-Column Arraycitations
- 20193D Printed Calibration Micro-phantoms for Validation of Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imagingcitations
- 2018Probe development of CMUT and PZT row-column-addressed 2-D arrayscitations
- 2018Increasing the field-of-view of row–column-addressed ultrasound transducers: implementation of a diverging compound lenscitations
- 2018Design of a novel zig-zag 192+192 Row Column Addressed Array Transducer: A simulation study.citations
- 2017Combined Colorimetric and Gravimetric CMUT Sensor for Detection of Phenylacetonecitations
- 2017Transmitting Performance Evaluation of ASICs for CMUT-Based Portable Ultrasound Scanners
- 2017Output Pressure and Pulse-Echo Characteristics of CMUTs as Function of Plate Dimensionscitations
- 20163-D Vector Flow Using a Row-Column Addressed CMUT Arraycitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row–Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization. Part I: Apodization Design and Line Element Beamformingcitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row–Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization. Part I: Apodization Design and Line Element Beamformingcitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row-Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodization:Part II: Transducer Fabrication and Experimental Resultscitations
- 20153-D Imaging Using Row-Column-Addressed Arrays With Integrated Apodizationcitations
- 2011Fusion bonding of silicon nitride surfacescitations
- 2010Touch mode micromachined capacitive pressure sensor with signal conditioning electronics
- 2009Highly sensitive micromachined capacitive pressure sensor with reduced hysteresis and low parasitic capacitancecitations
- 2008Giant Geometrically Amplified Piezoresistance in Metal-Semiconductor Hybrid Resistorscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Analytical Deflection Profiles and Pull-In Voltage Calculations of Prestressed Electrostatic Actuated MEMS Structures
Abstract
This paper presents a zeroth and first order perturbative analysis of prestressed electrostatic actuated Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). Perturbation theory is used to calculate the deflection profile of various MEMS structures, from which the pull-in voltage is estimated using the weighed residual method, where both a Galerkin expression and a Dirac delta function have been used as weight functions. A prestressed circular Capacitative Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (CMUT) is used as the main example in this paper. This device is modeled as a circular clamped plate subjected to an electrostatic pressure. The calculated pull-in voltage has been compared with experimental data of highly prestressed CMUTs, where a relative error between −36% and −8% is observed for a model that does not include stress. The model that includes the residual stress lowers the range of the relative error to values between −5% and 21%. To improve the accuracy of the pull-in voltage estimate Richardson extrapolation has been calculated from the zeroth and first order estimates. The pull-in voltage models are compared with a Finite Element Model (FEM), where an overestimation, in the high stress regime, of 10% is observed for the zeroth order model, less than 5% for the Galerkin method and 3% for the Richardson extrapolation.