Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sørensen, Christoffer Vendelbo

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Pull-in Analysis of CMUT Elements3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Thomsen, Erik Vilain
1 / 28 shared
Engholm, Mathias
1 / 14 shared
Havreland, Andreas Spandet
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Thomsen, Erik Vilain
  • Engholm, Mathias
  • Havreland, Andreas Spandet
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Pull-in Analysis of CMUT Elements

  • Sørensen, Christoffer Vendelbo
  • Thomsen, Erik Vilain
  • Engholm, Mathias
  • Havreland, Andreas Spandet
Abstract

This paper presents a novel characterization method for the pull-in voltage of a Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (CMUT) element. The presented method allows pull-in estimation of all CMUT cells contained in an element, which is in contrast to conventional methods that only allows for a pull-in average across an element. The methodology has been conducted on four different CMUT elements with a varying distance between the element separation and the CMUT cells closest to the edge. This distance was designed to be 3 µm, 5 µm, 10 µm, and 20 µm for the four CMUT elements, and the pull-in voltage of all the individual CMUT cells was determined using the presented methodology. The pull-in voltage of the CMUT cells at the edge of the element is observed to be significantly influenced as the distance to the element separation is lowered. The relative difference in the pull-in voltage between CMUT cells at the edge and the center are observed to be 14.8% and 2.8% for the designs with an edge distance of 3 µm and 5 µm, respectively. This edge effect is not observable for the two other designs where the relative difference is less than 0.5 %. Hence, this work demonstrates how the configuration CMUT cells can influence the pull-in voltage.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • ultrasonic