Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Connolly, James

  • Google
  • 5
  • 38
  • 43

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2022Hough Transform for Indirect Estimation of Wafer Placement Errors in Photoresist Spin Coating Processescitations
  • 2021Reliability and Validity of Clinically Accessible Smart Glove Technologies to Measure Joint Range of Motion14citations
  • 2021Chemical Vapor Deposition of MoS 2 for Back-End-of-Line Applications1citations
  • 2019Exploring conductivity in ex-situ doped Si thin films as thickness approaches 5 nm14citations
  • 2019Exploring conductivity in ex-situ doped Si thin films as thickness approaches 5 nm14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Reiter, Tamas
1 / 1 shared
Mccann, Michael
1 / 1 shared
Henderson, Jeffrey
1 / 1 shared
Condell, Joan
1 / 1 shared
Kelly, Daniel
1 / 1 shared
Curran, Professor Kevin
1 / 2 shared
Schmidt, Michael
1 / 53 shared
Hurley, Paul
1 / 5 shared
Lin, Jun
1 / 6 shared
Sheehan, Brendan
1 / 4 shared
Cullen, Conor
1 / 1 shared
Gity, Farzan
3 / 15 shared
Povey, Ian
1 / 1 shared
Düsberg, Georg
1 / 4 shared
Mc Evoy, Niall
1 / 3 shared
Bhat, Navakanta
1 / 3 shared
Monaghan, Scott
1 / 3 shared
Kumar Jha, Ravindra
1 / 1 shared
Coleman, Emma
1 / 4 shared
Sakhuja, Neha
1 / 1 shared
Walsh, Lee
1 / 2 shared
Mannarino, Teresa
1 / 1 shared
Bhattacharjee, Shubhadeep
1 / 3 shared
Mirabelli, Gioele
2 / 4 shared
Thomas, Kevin
2 / 3 shared
White, Mary
2 / 2 shared
Meaney, Fintan
2 / 2 shared
Pelucchi, Emanuele
2 / 5 shared
Lin, Rong
2 / 10 shared
Duffy, Ray
2 / 9 shared
Machale, John
2 / 2 shared
Long, Brenda
2 / 2 shared
Kennedy, Noel
2 / 2 shared
Hatem, Chris
2 / 2 shared
Eaton, Luke
2 / 2 shared
Petersen, Dirch Hjorth
2 / 33 shared
Petkov, Nikolay
2 / 7 shared
Ansari, Lida
2 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Reiter, Tamas
  • Mccann, Michael
  • Henderson, Jeffrey
  • Condell, Joan
  • Kelly, Daniel
  • Curran, Professor Kevin
  • Schmidt, Michael
  • Hurley, Paul
  • Lin, Jun
  • Sheehan, Brendan
  • Cullen, Conor
  • Gity, Farzan
  • Povey, Ian
  • Düsberg, Georg
  • Mc Evoy, Niall
  • Bhat, Navakanta
  • Monaghan, Scott
  • Kumar Jha, Ravindra
  • Coleman, Emma
  • Sakhuja, Neha
  • Walsh, Lee
  • Mannarino, Teresa
  • Bhattacharjee, Shubhadeep
  • Mirabelli, Gioele
  • Thomas, Kevin
  • White, Mary
  • Meaney, Fintan
  • Pelucchi, Emanuele
  • Lin, Rong
  • Duffy, Ray
  • Machale, John
  • Long, Brenda
  • Kennedy, Noel
  • Hatem, Chris
  • Eaton, Luke
  • Petersen, Dirch Hjorth
  • Petkov, Nikolay
  • Ansari, Lida
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Hough Transform for Indirect Estimation of Wafer Placement Errors in Photoresist Spin Coating Processes

  • Reiter, Tamas
  • Connolly, James
  • Mccann, Michael
Abstract

<p>This paper discusses a low-cost, computer vision based approach to indirectly estimate on-chuck substrate (wafer) placement errors for photoresist spin coating processes in a semiconductor manufacturing environment. Placement errors are estimated by calculating the relative displacement vector between circles bounding the wafer and the photoresist region post edge bead removal (EBR) processing. On-chuck wafer placement is critical in maintaining concentric EBR performances and without a method of detection it is challenging to contain mechanical tool failures, incorrectly performed preventive maintenance (PM) or other human errors. The study revisits the Hough transform (HT) for circle detections from accuracy and computational viewpoints using synthetically generated images. The detection accuracy of HT is proven outstanding. However, processing times dramatically increase (hours) in case of high resolution, real wafer images despite adequate preprocessing. This drawback is compensated by processing only subsets of images relying on mechanical wafer position controls during the wafer scan although, this potentially undermines the overall accuracy of this classical approach.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • semiconductor
  • spin coating