Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Munir, Nimra

  • Google
  • 4
  • 10
  • 23

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2024Investigation of the effect of Graphene oxide concentration on the final properties of Aspirin loaded PLA filaments for drug delivery systemscitations
  • 2023Interpretable machine learning methods for monitoring polymer degradation in extrusion of polylactic acid12citations
  • 2022NIR-Based Intelligent Sensing of Product Yield Stress for High-Value Bioresorbable Polymer Processing9citations
  • 2021Comparison of data summarization and feature selection techniques for in-process spectral data2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nugent, Michael J. D.
1 / 25 shared
Mcafee, Marion
3 / 22 shared
Lima, Tielidy De
1 / 1 shared
Mcmorrow, Ross
1 / 1 shared
Mcloone, Seán
1 / 3 shared
Whitaker, Darren
1 / 1 shared
Talvitie, Elina
1 / 4 shared
Mulrennan, Konrad
2 / 4 shared
Kellomäki, Minna
1 / 31 shared
Lyyra, Inari
1 / 7 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nugent, Michael J. D.
  • Mcafee, Marion
  • Lima, Tielidy De
  • Mcmorrow, Ross
  • Mcloone, Seán
  • Whitaker, Darren
  • Talvitie, Elina
  • Mulrennan, Konrad
  • Kellomäki, Minna
  • Lyyra, Inari
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Comparison of data summarization and feature selection techniques for in-process spectral data

  • Mulrennan, Konrad
  • Mcafee, Marion
  • Munir, Nimra
Abstract

<p>In this work, approaches to data summarization and feature selection are assessed for predicting the mechanical properties of a polymer product based on complex heterogeneous in-process data. Pressure and temperature data as well as Near Infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data were captured at different sampling frequencies during the process and used to predict the yield strength of the product. Direct interpretation of NIR spectra is recognized as an intractable problem in material processing and chemometric approaches are applied to build models which must be calibrated against lab-characterized response data. The low sampling rate of such lab characterization relative to in-process data capture raises the question of how best to summarize the process data when predicting the material properties. Further, conventional Principal Component Regression (PCR) and Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression chemometric methods lack interpretability of the model and do not provide much insight for how best to control the process. In this work we compare two different approaches to data summarization and compare two different Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) methods for feature selection. It is shown that RFE using Random Forest regression with data summarized over the entire production run yields the best predictive performance. It also delivers a sparse model in the original features which facilitates interpretation of physio-chemical changes in the material and provides useful insight for process control.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • strength
  • random
  • yield strength