Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Xu, Haojia

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Training Convolutional Neural Networks with Confocal Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Imaging for Power QFN Package Delamination Classificationcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zhang, Guoqi
1 / 20 shared
Smits, Edsger C. P.
1 / 3 shared
Martin, Henry Antony
1 / 2 shared
Van Driel, Willem
1 / 20 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zhang, Guoqi
  • Smits, Edsger C. P.
  • Martin, Henry Antony
  • Van Driel, Willem
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Training Convolutional Neural Networks with Confocal Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Imaging for Power QFN Package Delamination Classification

  • Zhang, Guoqi
  • Smits, Edsger C. P.
  • Martin, Henry Antony
  • Van Driel, Willem
  • Xu, Haojia
Abstract

This study introduces a training protocol utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Confocal Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (CSAM) imaging techniques to classify Power Quad Flat No-leads (PQFN) package delamination. The investigation involves empty PQFN packages with varied substrate metallizations subjected to thermal cycling. Four delamination classes were labeled: Die-pad delamination (Class-A), Bond-pad delamination (Class-B), both Die-pad and Bond-pad delamination (Class-C), and No delamination (Class-D). Due to data imbalance, additional randomness was introduced for distribution balancing. Residual Networks (ResNet-18) based CNN model was selected for classification. Five-fold cross-validation assessed overfitting performance concerning input data size, image resolution, and batch size. The ResNet-18 prediction performance was evaluated using precision and recall metrics, with the model achieving average precision and recall scores of 0.86/1 and 0.83/1, respectively. Additionally, a comparison of delamination among different substrate metallizations was presented with Ag and NiPdAu indicating significant delamination compared to bare Cu substrate. This study pioneers the integration of CNNs with CSAM imaging for package defect detection and classification, laying the groundwork for future research to address the complex interplay of multiple failure mechanisms in functional packages.

Topics
  • defect
  • microscopy