Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Karppinen, J.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 224

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2015Cycle aging of commercial NMC/graphite pouch cells at different temperatures221citations
  • 2007A comparative study of power cycling and thermal shock tests3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Vuorilehto, K.
1 / 2 shared
Skogström, L.
1 / 1 shared
Laurila, Tomi
2 / 96 shared
Nisula, M.
1 / 1 shared
Jalkanen, K.
1 / 1 shared
Kivilahti, J. K.
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2015
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Vuorilehto, K.
  • Skogström, L.
  • Laurila, Tomi
  • Nisula, M.
  • Jalkanen, K.
  • Kivilahti, J. K.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A comparative study of power cycling and thermal shock tests

  • Karppinen, J.
  • Laurila, Tomi
  • Kivilahti, J. K.
Abstract

<p>Thermal shock test is a traditionally used test to simulate thermomechanical stresses experienced by electronic products during their operational life span. However, because of increasing power densities and modular design of modern consumer devices, the stresses induced by thermal shocks are becoming too different from those experienced in operational environment. Inherent deficiencies in thermal shock test include the omission of strong local thermal gradients and electrical current stressing. To address these issues, power cycling was investigated as an alternative test method for high-density electronic assemblies. The thermal shock and power cycling tests were compared both experimentally and by using finite element modeling. Computationally the stresses caused by thermal shocks are almost twice as large as those caused by power cycling and therefore the life expectancy was considerably shorter. However, experimental testing yielded opposite results, with power cycled specimen failing much faster than their thermally cycled counterparts. The primary failure mechanism in the power cycling test was the same as in the thermal shock test: recrystallization-assisted crack nucleation and propagation in bulk solder interconnections. Additionally, increased growth of intermetallic reaction layers was observed in the power cycling test specimen. The tests were executed with component boards manufactured with the traditional SnPb-solder and with near-eutectic SnAgCu-solder. The results show that in both tests the lead-free interconnections are at least as reliable as those produced with the traditional tin-lead soldering. While the primary failure mechanism was the same in both tests, power cycling introduced secondary mechanisms that considerably accelerated the failure of test vehicles' solder interconnections. These secondary mechanisms, especially electromigration, are expected to become more dominant in the near future. Therefore power cycling can in many cases be regarded as a more realistic and advanced alternative to the traditional thermal shock test.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • crack
  • intermetallic
  • tin
  • recrystallization