Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Karuthedath, Cyril Baby

  • Google
  • 8
  • 22
  • 88

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2023Non-monolithic fabrication of thin-film microelectrode arrays on PMUT transducers as a bimodal neuroscientific investigation tool2citations
  • 2023An Ultrasonically Powered System Using an AlN PMUT Receiver for Delivering Instantaneous mW-Range DC Power to Biomedical Implants8citations
  • 2023Piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer and systemcitations
  • 2023Phase-Sensitive Air Flow Measurement Using PMUTs1citations
  • 2021Characterization of AlScN-based multilayer systems for piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducer (pMUT) fabrication16citations
  • 2021Characterization of AlScN-Based Multilayer Systems for Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer (pMUT) Fabrication16citations
  • 2020The impact of residual stress on resonating piezoelectric devices29citations
  • 2019Design and Fabrication of Aluminum Nitride Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers for Air Flow Measurements16citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wilson, Joshua
1 / 4 shared
Giagka, Vasiliki
2 / 20 shared
Velea, Andrada I.
1 / 1 shared
Gollhardt, Astrid
1 / 4 shared
Rashidi, Amin
1 / 5 shared
Savoia, Alessandro Stuart
1 / 4 shared
Saccher, Marta
1 / 4 shared
Dekker, Ronald
1 / 11 shared
Stubbe, Frederic
1 / 1 shared
Lavigne, Frederik
1 / 1 shared
Sebastian, Abhilash Thanniyil
2 / 2 shared
Sillanpää, Teuvo
3 / 7 shared
Pensala, Tuomas
5 / 17 shared
Martins, David Gomes
1 / 1 shared
Bespalova, Kristina
2 / 8 shared
Paulasto-Kröckel, Mervi
2 / 31 shared
Ross, Glenn
3 / 35 shared
Mertin, Stefan
2 / 6 shared
Österlund, Elmeri
2 / 8 shared
Paulasto-Krockel, Mervi
1 / 10 shared
Dong, Hongqun
1 / 9 shared
Saarilahti, Jaakko
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2021
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wilson, Joshua
  • Giagka, Vasiliki
  • Velea, Andrada I.
  • Gollhardt, Astrid
  • Rashidi, Amin
  • Savoia, Alessandro Stuart
  • Saccher, Marta
  • Dekker, Ronald
  • Stubbe, Frederic
  • Lavigne, Frederik
  • Sebastian, Abhilash Thanniyil
  • Sillanpää, Teuvo
  • Pensala, Tuomas
  • Martins, David Gomes
  • Bespalova, Kristina
  • Paulasto-Kröckel, Mervi
  • Ross, Glenn
  • Mertin, Stefan
  • Österlund, Elmeri
  • Paulasto-Krockel, Mervi
  • Dong, Hongqun
  • Saarilahti, Jaakko
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Non-monolithic fabrication of thin-film microelectrode arrays on PMUT transducers as a bimodal neuroscientific investigation tool

  • Karuthedath, Cyril Baby
  • Wilson, Joshua
  • Giagka, Vasiliki
  • Velea, Andrada I.
  • Gollhardt, Astrid
Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-based neuromodulation has recently emerged as a spatially selective yet non-invasive alternative to conventional electrically-based neural interfaces. However, the fundamental mechanisms of US neuromodulation are not yet clarified. Thus, there is a need for in-vitro bimodal investigation tools that allow us to compare the effect of US versus electrically-induced neural activity in the vicinity of the transducing element. To this end, we propose a MicroElectrode-MicroTransducer Array (MEMTA), where a dense array of electrodes is co-fabricated on top of a similarly dense array of US transducers.In this paper, we test the proof of concept for such co-fabrication using a non-monolithic approach, where, at its most challenging scenario, desired topologies require electrodes to be formed directly on top of fragile piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducer (PMUTs) membranes. On top of the PMUTs, a thin-film microelectrode array was developed utilizing microfabrication processes, including metal sputtering, lithography, etching and soft encapsulation. The samples were analysed through focused ion beam–scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), and the results have shown that damage to the membranes does not occur during any of the process steps. This paper proves that the non-monolithic development of a miniaturised bimodal neuroscientific investigation tool can be achieved, thus, opening up a series of possibilities for further understanding and investigation of the nervous system.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • focused ion beam
  • etching
  • lithography