Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Martinez-Hernandez, Uriel

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 2

University of Bath

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2018The assessment of viscoelastic models for nonlinear soft materials2citations
  • 2016Simulating the microstructural evolution of a Selective Laser Melted AA-2024citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Dehghani-Sanij, Abbas A.
1 / 1 shared
Solis-Ortega, Rodrigo D.
1 / 1 shared
Lopez, Omar
1 / 1 shared
Pinna, Christophe
1 / 10 shared
Ramirez, Jose
1 / 1 shared
Mumtaz, Kamran
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Dehghani-Sanij, Abbas A.
  • Solis-Ortega, Rodrigo D.
  • Lopez, Omar
  • Pinna, Christophe
  • Ramirez, Jose
  • Mumtaz, Kamran
OrganizationsLocationPeople

report

The assessment of viscoelastic models for nonlinear soft materials

  • Martinez-Hernandez, Uriel
  • Dehghani-Sanij, Abbas A.
  • Solis-Ortega, Rodrigo D.
Abstract

The increasing use of soft materials in robotics applications requires the development of mathematical models to describe their viscoelastic and nonlinear properties. The traditional linear viscoelastic models are unable to describe nonlinear strain-dependent behaviors. This limitation has been addressed by implementing a piecewise linearization (PL) in the simplest viscoelastic model, the Standard Linear Solid (SLS). In this work, we aim to implement the PL in a more complex model, the Wiechert model and compare the stress response of both linearized models. Therefore, the experimental data from the stress relaxation and tensile strength tests of six rubber-based materials is used to approximate the spring and dashpot constants of the SLS and the Wiechert model. Prior to implement the PL into the stress-strain curve of each material, the stress response from the Maxwell branches must be subtracted from this curve. By using the parameters obtained from fitting the Wiechert model into the stress relaxation curve, the response of both linearized models was improved. Due to the selection of constitutive equations evaluated, the linearized SLS model described the stress-strain curve more accurately. Finally, this work describes in details every step of the fitting process and highlights the benefits of using linearization methods to improve known models as an alternative of using highly complex models to describe the mechanical properties of soft materials.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • stress-strain curve
  • tensile strength
  • rubber
  • static light scattering