Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cheriere, Nathanaël

  • Google
  • 4
  • 2
  • 6

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2019Towards Malleable Distributed Storage Systems: From Models to Practicecitations
  • 2018Pufferbench: Evaluating and Optimizing Malleability of Distributed Storage3citations
  • 2018A Lower Bound for the Commission Times in Replication-Based Distributed Storage Systemscitations
  • 2017How Fast Can One Scale Down a Distributed File System?3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Dorier, Matthieu
2 / 4 shared
Antoniu, Gabriel
3 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Dorier, Matthieu
  • Antoniu, Gabriel
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

How Fast Can One Scale Down a Distributed File System?

  • Antoniu, Gabriel
  • Cheriere, Nathanaël
Abstract

For efficient Big Data processing, efficient resource utilization becomes a major concern as large-scale computing infrastructures such as supercomputers or clouds keep growing in size. Naturally, energy and cost savings can be obtained by reducing idle resources. Malleability, which is the possibility for resource managers to dynamically increase or reduce the resources of jobs, appears as a promising means to progress towards this goal. However, state-of-the-art parallel and distributed file systems have not been designed with malleability in mind. This is mainly due to the supposedly high cost of storage decommission, which is considered to involve expensive data transfers. Nevertheless, as network and storage technologies evolve, old assumptions on potential bottlenecks can be revisited. In this study, we evaluate the viability of malleability as a design principle for a distributed file system. We specifically model the duration of the decommission operation, for which we obtain a theoretical lower bound. Then we consider HDFS as a use case and we show that our model can explain the measured decommission times. The existing decommission mechanism of HDFS is good when the network is the bottleneck, but could be accelerated by up to a factor 3 when the storage is the limiting factor. With the highlights provided by our model, we suggest improvements to speed up decommission in HDFS and we discuss open perspectives for the design of efficient malleable distributed file systems.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy