| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Gregersen, Niels
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (21/21 displayed)
- 2024InAs(P)/InP QDs as sources of single indistinguishable photons at 1.55 µm
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art numerical simulation techniques for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane line defect cavities
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art numerical simulation techniques for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane line defect cavities
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art optical simulation methods for analyzing large nanophotonic structures
- 2018Benchmarking state-of-the-art optical simulation methods for analyzing large nanophotonic structures
- 2018Designing Single-Photon Sources: Towards Unity
- 2018Designing Single-Photon Sources: Towards Unity
- 2018Benchmarking five numerical simulation techniques for computing resonance wavelengths and quality factors in photonic crystal membrane line defect cavitiescitations
- 2018Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?
- 2018Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?
- 2018Benchmarking five numerical simulation techniques for computing resonance wavelengths and quality factors in photonic crystal membrane line defect cavitiescitations
- 2017Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities
- 2017Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities
- 2017Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavitiescitations
- 2017Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavitiescitations
- 2017Ultralow power all-optical switch
- 2016Comparison of four computational methods for computing Q factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane cavities
- 2016Comparison of four computational methods for computing Q factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane cavities
- 2015Impact of slow-light enhancement on optical propagation in active semiconductor photonic crystal waveguidescitations
- 2015Impact of slow-light enhancement on optical propagation in active semiconductor photonic crystal waveguidescitations
- 2012Effi›cient and broadband spontaneous emission control in fiber-like photonic nanowires
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Impact of slow-light enhancement on optical propagation in active semiconductor photonic crystal waveguides
Abstract
We derive and validate a set of coupled Bloch wave equations for analyzing the reflection and transmission properties of active semiconductor photonic crystal waveguides. In such devices, slow-light propagation can be used to enhance the material gain per unit length, enabling, for example, the realization of short optical amplifiers compatible with photonic integration. The coupled wave analysis is compared to numerical approaches based on the Fourier modal method and a frequency domain finite element technique. The presence of material gain leads to the build-up of a backscattered field, which is interpreted as distributed feedback effects or reflection at passive-active interfaces, depending on the approach taken. For very large material gain values, the band structure of the waveguide is perturbed, and deviations from the simple coupled Bloch wave model are found.