Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Brown, Colin

  • Google
  • 3
  • 27
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023IS1-related large-scale deletion of chromosomal regions harbouring the oxygen-insensitive nitroreductase gene nfsB causes nitrofurantoin heteroresistance in Escherichia coli6citations
  • 2023Household transmission of non-toxigenic diphtheria toxin gene-bearing Corynebacterium diphtheriae following a cluster of cutaneous cases in a specialist outpatient setting3citations
  • 2022The dark art of syphilis serology - an analysis of testing algorithms at a UK reference laboratory. 1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Potterill, Isabelle
1 / 2 shared
Sriskandan, Shiranee
1 / 1 shared
Jauneikaite, Elita
1 / 2 shared
Sabnis, Akshay
1 / 1 shared
Mumin, Zaynab
1 / 2 shared
Ellington, Matthew J.
1 / 1 shared
Edwards, Andrew
1 / 1 shared
Wan, Yu
1 / 2 shared
Meunier, Daniele
1 / 1 shared
Oboyle, Shennae
1 / 2 shared
Zoysa, Aruni De
1 / 1 shared
Hopkins, Katie
1 / 1 shared
Efstratiou, Androulla
1 / 1 shared
Nicholls, Margot
1 / 1 shared
Newsholme, William
1 / 1 shared
Fry, Norman
1 / 1 shared
Heathcock, Rachel Thorn
1 / 1 shared
Stephenson, Jim
1 / 1 shared
Litt, David
1 / 2 shared
Amirthalingam, Gayatri
1 / 1 shared
Sheppard, Carmen
1 / 2 shared
Pringle, Ellen
1 / 1 shared
Lacy, Joanne
1 / 2 shared
Daeth, Joshua
1 / 1 shared
Gower, Charlotte
1 / 1 shared
Groves, Natalie
1 / 1 shared
Chand, Meera
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Potterill, Isabelle
  • Sriskandan, Shiranee
  • Jauneikaite, Elita
  • Sabnis, Akshay
  • Mumin, Zaynab
  • Ellington, Matthew J.
  • Edwards, Andrew
  • Wan, Yu
  • Meunier, Daniele
  • Oboyle, Shennae
  • Zoysa, Aruni De
  • Hopkins, Katie
  • Efstratiou, Androulla
  • Nicholls, Margot
  • Newsholme, William
  • Fry, Norman
  • Heathcock, Rachel Thorn
  • Stephenson, Jim
  • Litt, David
  • Amirthalingam, Gayatri
  • Sheppard, Carmen
  • Pringle, Ellen
  • Lacy, Joanne
  • Daeth, Joshua
  • Gower, Charlotte
  • Groves, Natalie
  • Chand, Meera
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The dark art of syphilis serology - an analysis of testing algorithms at a UK reference laboratory.

  • Brown, Colin
Abstract

Introduction. Due to the complex nature of treponemal serology interpretation, testing algorithms vary across the UK.Gap statement. There is currently no gold standard method for interpretation of discordant serology results.Aim. To analyse serological response in early infection and to determine the best approach for discordant total antibody EIA and TPPA samples.Methodology. National reference laboratory serology and PCR (genital ulcer swabs) results from 2010 to 2017 were extracted from an electronic laboratory database.Results. A total of 24149 sera underwent analysis. Of syphilis PCR positive cases with contemporaneous sera, 33% (17/52) were IgM positive/equivocal, whilst all were EIA and TPPA positive. No sera with isolated IgM positivity (0/90) demonstrated seroconversion consistent with early treponemal infection, in contrast to 17% (2/12) of sera with isolated TPPA positivity. Isolated EIA positivity was observed in 6.2% (1499/24149) samples with the same result on repeat testing in 73% (154/211). In 100 samples with discordant EIA/TPPA results, IgG Immunoblot was more commonly positive (12/41, 29%) or equivocal (24/41, 59%), in those with a higher EIA antibody index, compared to those with a low antibody index, of which none tested positive and 2/3 (67 %) were equivocal.Conclusion. Isolated IgM positivity was not helpful in identifying early infection; isolated total antibody EIA positivity is unlikely to be a significant finding. IgG immunoblot testing was unable to determine clear treponemal antibody status in nearly half of all EIA/TPPA discordant samples.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • gold