Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Langlois, Michel

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Muscle strength is a major determinant of the blood pressure response to isometric stress testing: the Asklepios population study.5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gillebert, Thierry C.
1 / 2 shared
Segers, Patrick
1 / 2 shared
Van Daele, Caroline
1 / 1 shared
Meyer, Tim De
1 / 1 shared
De Buyzere, Marc
1 / 1 shared
Rietzschel, Ernst
1 / 1 shared
Chirinos Medina, Julio
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gillebert, Thierry C.
  • Segers, Patrick
  • Van Daele, Caroline
  • Meyer, Tim De
  • De Buyzere, Marc
  • Rietzschel, Ernst
  • Chirinos Medina, Julio
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Muscle strength is a major determinant of the blood pressure response to isometric stress testing: the Asklepios population study.

  • Gillebert, Thierry C.
  • Segers, Patrick
  • Van Daele, Caroline
  • Meyer, Tim De
  • De Buyzere, Marc
  • Rietzschel, Ernst
  • Langlois, Michel
  • Chirinos Medina, Julio
Abstract

AIM: Maximal handgrip strength is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality in economically and socioculturally diverse countries, yet the main determinants of cardiovascular response to change in afterload during handgrip are not well known. We examined the blood pressure (BP) responses during submaximal handgrip (at 25% of grip strength) and the determinants of grip strength.; METHODS: We studied 2215 participants from a population-based random sample without overt clinical disease (Asklepios Study; mean age 56.2 years). Handgrip testing was performed using a modified Jamar dynamometer with direct visual feedback. Simultaneously, a validated finger plethysmographic device measured continuous BP and heart rate.; RESULTS: During handgrip, SBP and DBP rose by, respectively, 20 ± 13 and 10 ± 6 mmHg. These changes were normally distributed and consistently higher in men. The main independent determinants of mean arterial pressure response during handgrip were: grip strength (F = 191.4; P < 0.001), baseline pulse pressure (F = 32.0; P < 0.001), height (F = 16.4; P < 0.001) and age (F = 12.8; P < 0.001). Grip strength was associated with muscle mass, better metabolic health, but also with higher baseline DBP. There was a significant graded increase in maximum pressure achieved and in the magnitude of pressure change during handgrip with increasing BP categories (P for trend <0.001).; CONCLUSION: The population BP response to handgrip is variable and its predominant determinant turned out to be grip strength itself, which should be accounted for in future analyses. Higher baseline BP, even within the normotensive range, acted as an independent and graded predictor of BP increase during handgrip.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • random