Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vanaudenaerde, Saartje

  • Google
  • 1
  • 8
  • 18

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Changes in Vestibular Function Following Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: a Prospective Study18citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Dhooge, Ingeborg
1 / 3 shared
Hecke, Ruth Van
1 / 1 shared
Maes, Leen
1 / 2 shared
Valette, Romain
1 / 2 shared
Martens, Sarie
1 / 1 shared
Rombaut, Lotte
1 / 1 shared
Swinnen, Freya
1 / 2 shared
Dhondt, Cleo
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Dhooge, Ingeborg
  • Hecke, Ruth Van
  • Maes, Leen
  • Valette, Romain
  • Martens, Sarie
  • Rombaut, Lotte
  • Swinnen, Freya
  • Dhondt, Cleo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Changes in Vestibular Function Following Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: a Prospective Study

  • Dhooge, Ingeborg
  • Hecke, Ruth Van
  • Maes, Leen
  • Valette, Romain
  • Vanaudenaerde, Saartje
  • Martens, Sarie
  • Rombaut, Lotte
  • Swinnen, Freya
  • Dhondt, Cleo
Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives:</jats:title><jats:p>Given the close interconnection between the auditory and vestibular end organs, the increasingly broad application of (bilateral) cochlear implantation (CI) in children raises concern about its impact on the vestibular function. Unfortunately, literature on this matter is inconclusive and subject to several limitations. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the impact of pediatric CI on the vestibular function in a large sample of children, representative for the current CI population.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design:</jats:title><jats:p>Fifty hearing-impaired children followed in the Ghent University Hospital were included in this prospective study. Twenty-seven patients underwent unilateral CI, and 23 were bilaterally implanted (9 sequentially, 14 simultaneously), adding up to 73 implanted ears. Children’s median age at first implantation was 29 (range 8 to 194) months. Vestibular assessment was scheduled on average 2.8 months (SD: 3.6) before and 4.6 (SD: 4.0) months after implantation and consisted of video Head Impulse Testing of the lateral semicircular canals, rotatory testing (0.16, 0.04, and 0.01 Hz) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) testing with bone conduction stimulation. Caloric testing was added in children older than 3 years of age.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>Overall, group analysis in our sample of 73 CI-ears did not reveal any significant impact on the vestibular function, except for a significantly shortened ipsilateral N1 latency of the cVEMP responses (<jats:italic toggle="yes">p</jats:italic> = 0.027) after CI. Complete ipsilateral loss of function after implantation was seen in 5% (3/54) of all CI-ears on the video head impulse testing, in 0% (0/10) on the caloric test and in 2% (1/52) on the cVEMP, notably all patients deafened by a congenital cytomegalovirus infection.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p>The impact of CI on the vestibular function in our dataset was limited. Therefore, the many advantages of simultaneous bilateral implantation may outweigh the risk for vestibular damage postoperatively. However, the impact on the vestibular function may be dependent on various factors (e.g., etiology of the hearing loss), and the clinical outcome is still difficult to predict. Vestibular assessment remains thus an important aspect in the pediatric CI population; first because the vestibular function should be considered in the decision-making process on (simultaneous or sequential bilateral) CI and second because it is essential to reveal a possible additional sensory deficit, allowing an opportunity for rehabilitation to improve the overall outcome of these children.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • chemical ionisation