Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Osbahr, Daryl C.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2003Meshes in Rotator Cuff Repair7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Muller, Michael
1 / 2 shared
Murrell, George A. C.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2003

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Muller, Michael
  • Murrell, George A. C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Meshes in Rotator Cuff Repair

  • Muller, Michael
  • Murrell, George A. C.
  • Osbahr, Daryl C.
Abstract

<p>Alloplastic meshes are potential alternatives for reconstruction of irreparable rotator cuff tears. This study evaluates the biomechanical suitability at the tendon mesh interface of five different meshes. Twenty-five ovine infraspinatus tendons were repaired in five experimental groups (n = 5) with an alloplastic mesh. The control group was repaired with sutures (n = 5). Group 1 was repaired with a polypropylene mesh (Prolene), group 2 with a polypropylene/polyglactin mesh (Vypro), group 3 with a 1-mm thick ePTFE mesh, group 4 with a 2-mm ePTFE mesh (Gore-Tex), and group 5 with a 2.87-mm PTFE felt (Bard). The tendon-mesh interface was tested by a tensile testing machine until failure occurred. The control group failed at a mean (± SD) ultimate tensile strength of 98 ± 14 N with the sutures cutting out of the tendon. The Prolene mesh failed at 72 ± 12 N with the sutures cutting through the mesh. In the Vypro group, the repair failed at 75 ± 14 N. The 1-mm ePTFE mesh failed at 78 ± 9 N. The 2-mm ePTFE mesh failed at 109 ± 12 N and the PTFE felt at 111 ± 16 N with the sutures cutting through the tendon. There was a statistical significant difference (P &lt; 0.01) between the 2-mm ePTFE mesh and the PTFE felt when compared with the other tested meshes. The ideal rotator cuff repair should possess high initial fixation strength and maintain mechanical stability over time. The 2-mm ePTFE mesh and the PTFE felt demonstrated significantly superior initial fixation strength at the mesh tendon interface when compared with the other tested meshes.</p>

Topics
  • strength
  • tensile strength