Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Barfod, Gry Hoffmann

  • Google
  • 5
  • 19
  • 45

Aarhus University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2023Iron Isotope Systematics of the Skaergaard Intrusion and Implications for its Liquid Line of Descent3citations
  • 2021On diverse arts7citations
  • 2021On diverse arts:crucible metallurgy and the polymetallic cycle at Scandinavia’s earliest Viking town, Ribe (8th–9th c. CE), Denmark7citations
  • 2020Copper-based metalwork in Roman to early Islamic Jerash (Jordan)14citations
  • 2019From nummi minimi to fulūs—small change and wider issues14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Salmonsen, Lars Peter
1 / 1 shared
Nielsen, Troels F. D.
1 / 1 shared
Thy, Peter
1 / 2 shared
Glessner, Justin
1 / 1 shared
Stausberg, Niklas
1 / 1 shared
Tegner, Christian
1 / 1 shared
Lesher, Charles Edward
1 / 1 shared
Brown, Eric
1 / 7 shared
Sindbæk, Søren
1 / 3 shared
Lesher, Charles
4 / 8 shared
Birch, Thomas
4 / 8 shared
Feveile, Claus
2 / 2 shared
Orfanou, Vana
4 / 5 shared
Sindbæk, Søren Michael
1 / 1 shared
Raja, Rubina
2 / 2 shared
Lichtenberger, Achim
2 / 2 shared
Eger, Christoph
1 / 1 shared
Schulze, Ingrid
1 / 1 shared
Schulze, Wolfgang
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2021
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Salmonsen, Lars Peter
  • Nielsen, Troels F. D.
  • Thy, Peter
  • Glessner, Justin
  • Stausberg, Niklas
  • Tegner, Christian
  • Lesher, Charles Edward
  • Brown, Eric
  • Sindbæk, Søren
  • Lesher, Charles
  • Birch, Thomas
  • Feveile, Claus
  • Orfanou, Vana
  • Sindbæk, Søren Michael
  • Raja, Rubina
  • Lichtenberger, Achim
  • Eger, Christoph
  • Schulze, Ingrid
  • Schulze, Wolfgang
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Iron Isotope Systematics of the Skaergaard Intrusion and Implications for its Liquid Line of Descent

  • Salmonsen, Lars Peter
  • Nielsen, Troels F. D.
  • Thy, Peter
  • Barfod, Gry Hoffmann
  • Glessner, Justin
  • Stausberg, Niklas
  • Tegner, Christian
  • Lesher, Charles Edward
  • Brown, Eric
Abstract

<p>The Skaergaard intrusion is one of the most thoroughly studied layered mafic intrusions on Earth and an exceptional example of (near) closed-system magmatic differentiation. We report new Fe isotope data for whole rocks, and magnetite and ilmenite separates through the layered series (LS) and upper border series (UBS) of the intrusion. δ<sup>56</sup>Fe values for gabbroic rocks range from 0.033‰ to 0.151‰ with an abrupt step increase at the base of Lower Zone c (LZc) within LS with the appearance of cumulus magnetite and subsequent decline accompanying FeTi oxide fractionation. The lowest δ<sup>56</sup>Fe values are found near the Upper Zone b (UZb) to c (UZc) boundary followed by a sharp rise across UZc approaching the Sandwich Horizon. Magnetite-ilmenite separates straddle bulk rock compositions with fractionation factors (Δ<sup>56</sup>Fe<sub>mt-ilm</sub>) of 0.081‰ to 0.239‰, consistent with subsolidus equilibration. Granophyric rocks occurring as pods, sheets and wispy layers from the upper zone and UBS equivalents and having unradiogenic Sr similar to gabbroic rocks of Skaergaard, are isotopically heavier than their host ferrodiorites (Δ<sup>56</sup>Fe<sub>granophyre-ferrodiorite</sub> ≥ 0.1‰) reaching a maximum δ<sup>56</sup>Fe of 0.217‰ in UBS. A fused xenolith from UBS has δ<sup>56</sup>Fe = 0.372‰. This range in δ<sup>56</sup>Fe spans much of that reported for terrestrial igneous rocks, and like the global dataset, shows a pronounced increase in δ<sup>56</sup>Fe with inferred silica content of modeled Skaergaard liquids. Forward modeling of closed system fractional solidification was undertaken to account for Fe isotope systematics, first by testing published liquid lines of descent (LLD), and then by exploring improvements and considering the impacts of liquid immiscibility, crustal contamination, fluid exsolution and diffusional processes. Our modeling relies on published Fe<sup>+2</sup> and Fe<sup>+3</sup> force constants for magmatic minerals and silicate glasses, and the most reliable estimates of the average bulk composition and mass proportions of the well-defined subzones of the intrusion. We show that the increase in δ<sup>56</sup>Fe across the LZb-LZc boundary is readily explained by the increased incorporation of Fe<sup>+3</sup> into the crystallizing solid including magnetite. We further demonstrate that the classic Fenner LLD, involving strong Fe enrichment at nearly constant silica, does not lead to a rise in δ<sup>56</sup>Fe toward the end stages of evolution, while a Bowen-like LLD, with little Fe enrichment and strong Si enrichment, also underestimates enrichment in heavy Fe isotopes in the ferrodiorites of UZc. A LLD following an intermediate path involving modest Fe and Si enrichment, followed by Fe depletion best explains the observations. We predict ~3.5% (by mass) residual liquid after crystallization of UZc having a composition similar to felsic segregations in pegmatitic bodies found in the intrusion. While liquid immiscibility may have been encountered within fractionating mush at the margins of the intrusion, the Fe isotope systematics do not support liquid phase separation of the bulk magma. Crustal contamination, fluid exsolution, hydrothermal alteration and thermal diffusion are also shown to have no resolvable effect on the Fe isotope composition of the gabbroic and granophyric rocks. We conclude that the Fe isotope systematics documented in the Skaergaard intrusion reflect the dominant role of fractionating Fe-rich minerals from gabbroic through ferrodioritic to rhyolitic liquids. The success of our model to account for the observed Fe isotope systematics for Skaergaard demonstrates the utility of Fe<sup>+2</sup> and Fe<sup>+3</sup> force constants determined at ambient conditions to model magmatic conditions and gives critical insights into plutonic processes fractionating Fe isotopes complementary to the volcanic record.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mineral
  • glass
  • glass
  • layered
  • iron
  • crystallization
  • liquid phase
  • laser sintering
  • fractionation