Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Slatter, Mandy

  • Google
  • 3
  • 6
  • 0

Royal United Hospital

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023P12 Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) schemes—revisiting urinary tract infection (UTI) management. What worked? What lasted? What next?citations
  • 2023Feasibility of retrospective chart review to assess alignment of urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnosis, testing and treatment decisions with UKHSA diagnostic guidelines in patients 65 years+ in the Emergency Department (ED)citations
  • 2023P09 Feasibility of retrospective chart review to assess alignment of urinary tract infection diagnosis, testing and treatment decisions with UKHSA diagnostic guidance in patients 65 years+ in the emergency departmentcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Chan, Teresa
1 / 1 shared
Aprilia, Valentin
1 / 1 shared
Boyd, Rebecca
1 / 1 shared
Hay, Alastair
2 / 2 shared
Jones, Matthew
1 / 3 shared
Jones, Matthew
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Chan, Teresa
  • Aprilia, Valentin
  • Boyd, Rebecca
  • Hay, Alastair
  • Jones, Matthew
  • Jones, Matthew
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

P12 Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) schemes—revisiting urinary tract infection (UTI) management. What worked? What lasted? What next?

  • Slatter, Mandy
  • Chan, Teresa
  • Aprilia, Valentin
  • Boyd, Rebecca
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>UK CQUIN schemes encourage an improvement focus on a specific area of care. In 2019, CQUIN CCG1a: Improving the management of lower UTI in older people1 was adopted at the RUH resulting in increased alignment with UK guidance on diagnosis and treatment.2 Our aim was to investigate whether this improvement was sustained two years later. This would help inform quality improvement interventions prior to adoption of the 2022 CQUIN, CCG2: Appropriate antibiotic prescribing for UTI in adults aged 16+.3</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>Service evaluation of the UTI pathway including compliance with two of the CQUIN care processes for UTI diagnosis in patients age 65+ presenting to ED (not admitted): (i) diagnosis excludes use of urine dipstick in people aged 65+; and (ii) urine sample sent to microbiology as per UK guidance.2</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A search of the electronic patient record for key terms (Table 1) identified 6076 ED attendances for patients age 65+ between 1 August and 31 October 2021 of which 40 were identified with a primary diagnosis of UTI not requiring hospital admission. Paramedic, ED and Urgent Treatment Centre notes (paper and electronic) were reviewed in detail and information gathered regarding presence/absence of UTI symptoms aligned to diagnostic guidelines;2 presence/absence of urine dipstick test; and presence/absence of urine sample for culture and susceptibility testing. Findings were compared with identical trust data for patients (admitted and non-admitted) obtained during the 2019 CQUIN: Q1 April–June; Q2 July–September; Q3 October–December. During this period improvement interventions were implemented.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>See Table 2.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Following intensive staff education improved practice regarding urine dipstick testing and appropriate urine sampling in elderly patients with possible UTI was observed during the 2019 CQUIN period. Two years later this improvement had not been sustained. When planning interventions during the 2022 CQUIN,3 consideration should be given to a bundle of interventions including education, data feedback and systems improvement, for example, computerized decision support systems (CDSS) to embed sustained change.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • susceptibility
  • aligned