Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vareda, Raquel

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022COVID-19 contact tracing apps in Europe, technological feat or failure?citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Santos, A.
1 / 12 shared
Rachadell, J.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Santos, A.
  • Rachadell, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

COVID-19 contact tracing apps in Europe, technological feat or failure?

  • Vareda, Raquel
  • Santos, A.
  • Rachadell, J.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>In the context of infectious disease control (IDC), public health services (PHS) have been under great pressure during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially with the burden of contact tracing. Most European Union countries have developed contact tracing apps for smartphones (CTA) with the goal of aiding PHS in IDC. CTAs generally use proximity data from mobile devices to determine a user's risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, thus providing testing and isolation recommendations. This review aimed to study the acceptance and adoption of CTAs in Europe.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>5 European countries were selected: Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy. A literature review was carried out and official sources of information from each country were consulted in order to compare the adoption of each national CTA. Criterias included number of downloads, rating in the app stores, costo of development, proportion of positive tests registered. Potential factors influencing population adherence to CTAs were also investigated.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In proportion to their population, the number of downloads varied significantly in each country (18 % in Spain, 67% in France, 75% in Ireland). Except for Spain, all countries integrated additional functions into the CTA to increase its uptake, such as access to the vaccination certificate. App stores ratings ranged from 3.0 (Spain) to 3.9 (France and Ireland). The proportion of tests added in the apps varied significantly (1% in Italy and Spain, 4% in Ireland, 10% in France and 17% in Germany). Concerns that lead to the non-use of CTAs were related to data protection, smartphone battery drainage and app bugs.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>CTAs as a way to identify contacts from a positive case had a low impact in the analyzed countries, with low population adherence being an important factor. Adding more features within the apps, minimizing bugs, and increasing public confidence in data privacy seem essential to increase uptake in the future.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Key messages</jats:title></jats:sec>

Topics
  • size-exclusion chromatography